3D vs. 2D-4 K: Performance and self-perception of laparoscopic novices in a randomized prospective teaching intervention using standard tasks and box trainers

Benny Kölbel,Julian Ragnitz,Kevin Schäle,Moritz Witzenhausen,Steffen Axt,Christian Beltzer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03515-5
2024-11-01
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Abstract:The use of three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy in surgical practice and training has been an area of research and discussion. Studies have suggested that 3D vision can improve speed and precision compared to traditional two-dimensional (2D) displays, while other authors found no benefits on the learning curves of laparoscopic novices. Modern two-dimensional laparoscopy with a resolution of 3840 × 2160 pixels (2D-4 K) seems to improve laparoscopic view and helps learners orient without stereopsis. However, evidence comparing these systems for laparoscopic training is limited. Therefore, the impact of viewing mode (2D-4 K vs. 3D) on learning and task proficiency remains unclear.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?