A probabilistic case for a large missing carbon sink on Mars after 3.5 billion years ago

Andy W. Heard,Edwin S. Kite
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2019.116001
IF: 5.3
2020-02-01
Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Abstract:<p>Mars has a thin (6 mbar) CO<sub>2</sub> atmosphere currently. There is strong evidence for paleolakes and rivers formed by warm climates on Mars, including after 3.5 billion years (Ga) ago, which indicates that a CO<sub>2</sub> atmosphere thick enough to permit a warm climate was present at these times. Since Mars no longer has a thick CO<sub>2</sub> atmosphere, it must have been lost. One possibility is that Martian CO<sub>2</sub> was lost to space. Oxygen escape rates from Mars are high enough to account for loss of a thick CO<sub>2</sub> atmosphere, if CO<sub>2</sub> was the main source of escaping O. But here, using H isotope ratios, O escape calculations, and quantification of the surface O sinks on Mars, we show for the first time that O escape from Mars after 3.5 Ga must have been predominantly associated with the loss of H<sub>2</sub>O, not CO<sub>2</sub>, and therefore it is unlikely that ≥250 mbar Martian CO<sub>2</sub> has been lost to space in the last 3.5 Ga, because such results require highly unfavored O loss scenarios. It is possible that the presence of young rivers and lakes on Mars could be reconciled with limited CO<sub>2</sub> loss to space if crater chronologies on Mars are sufficiently incorrect that all apparently young rivers and lakes are actually older than 3.5 Ga, or if climate solutions exist for sustained runoff on Mars with atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> pressure &lt;250 mbar. However, our preferred solution to reconcile the presence of &lt;3.5 Gya rivers and lakes on Mars with the limited potential for CO<sub>2</sub> loss to space is a large, as yet undiscovered, geological C sink on Mars.</p>
geochemistry & geophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?