Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of robot‐assisted neck dissections

Vusala Snyder,Brandon Smith,Seungwon Kim,Matthew E. Spector,Umamaheswar Duvvuri
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.27731
2024-03-17
Head & Neck
Abstract:Background Robot‐assisted neck dissection (RAND) for the management of the regional lymphatic basin offers the potential for improved cosmesis and reduced lymphedema. While RAND has been previously described, functional outcome and oncologic control rates need further elucidation. Methods A retrospective, matched cohort study of neck dissections completed at UPMC from 2017 to 2021 was conducted. RAND was identified and matched to open neck dissections (open) in a 1:2 ratio. Matching characteristics included primary cancer site, pre‐operative clinical N‐stage, age at time of surgery, HPV status, and previous chemoradiation treatment (salvage vs. nonsalvage procedure). Additional information was collected on patient demographics, surgery characteristics, and outcomes. Comparisons were made using t‐test, chi‐square test, Fisher's exact test, and Kaplan–Meier Wilcoxon (KMW) test with p
surgery,otorhinolaryngology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?