Abstract:Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are characterized by idiopathic chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, comprising the two major entities ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). A series of studies have demonstrated that perturbations of the indigenous gut microbiota, persistent infections, environmental factors, and genetic variants contribute to dysregulated immune responses to microbiota, leading to the development of IBD.1, 2 The incidence and prevalence of IBD are increasing globally, particularly in developing countries. The precise etiologies and pathophysiology are unknown, and therefore medical therapy to cure these diseases is not yet available. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified > 240 genetic loci associated with human IBD. However, most IBD genetic associations have been derived using individuals from European (EUR) ancestries, with only a few studies of much smaller sample sizes in East Asian (EAS) ancestries, particularly the Chinese population.3, 4 Recently in Nat Genet, Liu et al. are the first to clarify the genetic architectures associated with human IBD using the largest samples from EAS ancestries including Chinese IBD patients.5 They identified 16 new genetic loci just across EAS ancestries. Variance explained for these IBD EAS loci across EUR and EAS was mainly by higher minor allele frequencies (MAFs) in EAS instead of similar effect sizes (average MAF 0.25 versus 0.17, two-sided paired t-test p = .015) (Figure 1), suggesting the importance of including global ancestries in genetic studies to ensure the relevance of the genetic findings.5 Furthermore, Liu et al. identified 81 new genetic loci associated with IBD across both EAS and EUR ancestries, thus increasing the number of IBD-associated genetic loci to 320 by comparing with 45 106 IBD cases and 353 562 healthy donors from East Asian countries (China, Korea and Japan), the International IBD Genetics Union (IIBDGC) and FinnGen.5 Variance explained by IBD-associated loci differs across EAS ancestries and EUR ancestries, which is, to a greater degree, driven by MAFs but less by the effect sizes (32% of IBD associations have different MAFs, and 22% have different odds ratios).5 Liu et al. have found that there is a comparable single nucleotide polymorphism-based heritability across EAS ancestries and EUR ancestries, indicating that the amount of genetic contribution to IBD is roughly the same across the two populations. Besides, Liu et al. found that the genetic effects of many IBD loci are consistent in both ancestries, with only a few loci as clear exceptions, for example, tumour necrosis factor super family 15 (TNFSF15), colony-stimulating factor 2 receptor subunit beta and interleukin 23 receptors. As the variance explained for IBD loci differs across ancestries, the ability to exploit genetic loci and predict an individual's disease risk of IBD also differs greatly. Liu et al. estimated this ability using polygenic risk score (PRS) and observed that PRS trained in the EUR population has a reduced accuracy in the EAS population. To some extent, the accuracy of predicting an individual's risk of CD or UC could be improved by jointly modeling EAS and EUR populations. Accordingly, the genetic diversity of the population plays a major role in GWAS for the equitable deployment of PRS in clinical settings.5 Susceptibility genes are significantly related to clinical manifestations, course of disease, and treatment response. Previous studies have shown that variants in nudix hydrolase 15 are associated with an increased risk of thiopurine-induced myelosuppression and that these variants have a great predictive power for thiopurine-induced myelosuppression.6 Precision and personalized medicine based on individual pharmacogenomic information enable the safe use of thiopurines by minimizing thiopurine-induced severe side effects (e.g. leukopenia and alopecia) in IBD patients. Moreover, the ATG16L1 genotype in CD patients largely affects the efficacy of corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, and biological agents.7 As a canonical autophagy-regulating protein, ATG16L1 has been found to be downregulated in different types of tissues in Chinese CD patients, suggesting that a conjoint analysis of protein and gene enables us to screen more variants in different populations.8 Previous reports have shown that the IL-23R genotype is an optimal predictor of an early response to anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody (i.e., infliximab) in UC patients.9 Accumulating studies have tried to explore the association between the genetic characteristics and clinical phenotypes and outcome and found that nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain containing 2 (NOD2) gene polymorphisms are associated with age and complications of CD patients. Importantly, the most common genetic variant of ATG16L1 (rs2241880) is significantly associated with the development of CD perianal disease.7 Precision and personalized medicine is a hotspot of IBD study. The data converging multiple omics, data integration, computer networking models, and new clinical trials lay the foundation for precision medicine in the future.10 Liu et al. have highlighted the similarities and differences in the genetic architectures between EUR and EAS ancestries and pinpointed the clinical significances relevant to IBD genetic study for the first time.5 The latest research progress in genetic characteristics of IBD in Chinese and other EAS ancestries will help us to better understand the pathogenesis of IBD and provide precision medicine in these emerging regions with high incidences of disease, particularly in EAS countries (Figure 2). The authors declare no conflict of interest.

The relationship between extreme inter-individual variation in macrophage gene expression and genetic susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease

Susceptibility Gene Profiling Elucidates the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Provides Precision Medicine.

Host-microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease

OP08 Multi-ancestry genome-wide association study of inflammatory bowel disease identifies 125 novel loci and directly implicates new genes in disease susceptibility

OP14 Interpreting genome-wide association studies of Inflammatory Bowel Disease through the lens of single-cell sequencing

Dynamic role of macrophage CX3CR1 expression in inflammatory bowel disease

Gene-microbiota interactions contribute to the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammation status modulates the effect of host genetic variation on intestinal gene expression in inflammatory bowel disease

Genetics of inflammatory bowel disease: clues to pathogenesis.

Trans-ancestry, Bayesian meta-analysis discovers 20 novel risk loci for inflammatory bowel disease in an African American, East Asian and European cohort

Combined Bulk and Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis to Reveal the Potential Influences of Intestinal Inflammatory Disease on Multiple Sclerosis

Human Intestinal Macrophages Are Involved in the Pathology of Both Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn Disease

P018 Myeloid diversity in inflammatory bowel disease revealed by single-cell transcriptomics

Associations of inflammatory cytokines with inflammatory bowel disease: a Mendelian randomization study

Mucosal host-microbe interactions associate with clinical phenotypes in inflammatory bowel disease

Genetic insight into the relationship between inflammatory bowel disease and Clostridioides difficile infection

A disease-associated gene desert orchestrates macrophage inflammatory responses via ETS2

Causal relationship between circulating immune cells and inflammatory bowel disease: A Mendelian randomization analysis

Mucosal Genome-Wide Methylation Changes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Identifying Common Genetic Etiologies Between Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Related Immune-Mediated Diseases

A disease-associated gene desert directs macrophage inflammation through ETS2