Development and Validation of a Novel TP53 Mutation Signature That Predicts Risk of Metastasis in Primary Prostate Cancer

Mohammed Alshalalfa,Yang Liu,Elai Davicioni,Vinayak Muralidhar,Fallon E. Chipidza,Brandon A. Mahal,R. Jeffrey Karnes,Neil E. Martin,Kent W. Mouw,Felix Y. Feng,Paul L. Nguyen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2020.08.004
IF: 3.121
2021-06-01
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Introduction/background</h3><p>Prostate tumors with TP53 gene mutations are molecularly heterogenous and the presence of TP53 gene mutations has been linked to inferior outcomes. We developed an RNA-based gene signature that detects underlying TP53 gene mutations and identifies wild-type prostate tumors that are analogous to TP53-mutant tumors.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>Using genomic expression profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we developed a mutation signature score to predict prostatic tumors with a molecular fingerprint similar to tumors with TP53-mutations. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve assessed model accuracy in predicting TP53 mutations, and Cox regression models measured association between the signature and progression-free survival (PFS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>The TP53 signature score achieved an AUC of 0.84 in the training and 0.82 in the validation cohorts for predicting an underlying mutation. In three retrospective cohorts, a high score was prognostic for poor 5-year MFS: 46% vs 81% (HR:3.05, p &lt; 0.0001, <em>JHU cohort),</em> 64 % vs 83% (HR:2.77, p&lt;0.0001, <em>Mayo cohor</em>t), and 71% vs 97% (HR:6.8, p=0.0001, <em>BWH cohor</em>t). The signature also identified TP53-wildtype tumors molecularly analogous to TP53 mutant tumors, wherein high signature score correlated with worse 5-year MFS (50% vs 82%, HR 3.05, p &lt; 0.0001).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>This novel mutational signature predicted tumors with TP53 mutations, identified TP53-wildtype tumors analogous to mutant tumors, and was independently associated with poor MFS. This signature can therefore be used to strengthen existing clinical risk stratification tools.</p>
oncology,urology & nephrology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?