Abstract:Data sources The authors searched Embase, Medline/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and LILACS ranging from inception to 23 November 2021. A grey literature search was run utilising OpenGrey along with Google Scholar (most relevant first 200 hits). For the identification of additional articles of relevance, a hand-search was also conducted upon the list of references of all the included studies. No restrictions in terms of date and language were utilised in the search. Controlled vocabulary in the form of free text and MeSH terms was utilised to execute the search strategy.Study selection A screening of the studies potentially satisfying the eligibility criteria was conducted independently by two reviewers on the basis of their abstracts and titles. The records so retrieved were classified under the headings of 'exclude', 'include' and 'uncertain'. Upon the completion of this exercise, an acquisition was made of the full texts of papers judged relevant. Data extraction was performed on all the studies which met the eligibility criteria. Diverging views among the reviewers were resolved with consensus. The judgement of a third reviewer was sought to resolve any disagreements.Data extraction and synthesis Information extraction covered measurement details (cotinine levels of children and/or self-reported questionnaires from children and/or parents); study identification (year of publication, first author and location); distribution according to the status of second-hand smoke and sample characteristics; exposure criteria (according to cotinine levels or severity of parental smoking); analytic approach utilised (multivariate or bivariate analysis); results along with assessment of outcomes (partial- or full-mouth protocol used) and criteria (index type used). Due to only cross-sectional studies being included upon retrieval, the methodological quality assessment was performed utilising an adapted variant of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The judgement criteria used included non-response rate, sample size and representativity, confounding control, determination of exposure, outcome assessment and statistical analysis. Evidence tables were built utilising qualitative synthesis in order to ascertain differences in the results and characteristics of the included studies. In case the eligibility criteria were met by three or more papers, the data was subjected to pair-wise comparisons between those unexposed to second-hand smoke with those exposed to it in terms of the specified periodontal outcome measures. Periodontal outcomes were evaluated as continuous measures with the random-effects model. Cochran's Q-test was utilised to assess the heterogeneity and in cases where the heterogeneity was unexplained, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate whether a single study exerted a significant effect upon the pooled results.Results Six hundred and thirty-seven records were obtained from the search. After screening of the abstracts and titles, eight studies met the eligibility criteria subsequent to the reading of the complete text of 16 reports. One study was conducted in a high socio-demographic index (SDI) country with four in the middle-high, one in the middle and two in the lower-middle SDI countries. Four studies did not provide details pertaining to outcome assessment, while one included a full-mouth and another three, a partial-mouth assessment protocol. Two studies were deemed to be of high quality in terms of methodological quality assessment. Three reports possessed a satisfactory sample size while none of the included studies included data relating to non-response rate. The authors deemed meta-analysis to be possible only in the case of periodontal probing depth (PPD) and gingival index (GI) scores. There was a positive association reported between a high GI score and second-hand smoke exposure. There was, however, no difference present at the subgroup level in terms of the SDI of the country of the study, the age of the cohort as well as the period in which the study was carried out. In contrast, a significant effect was observed for the location of the study data collection in that children from areas with a higher current-smoker prevalence exhibited greater GI scores as a result of increased second-hand smoke exposure. There was no observable difference from the pooled estimate for second-hand smoke exposure compared to the unexposed cohort in terms of PPD. No effects were demonstrable at the subgroup level upon data stratification for the study country SDI and period of data collection. There was greater clinical attachment loss among children who were exposed to second-hand smoke, particularly for those whose fathers were smokers despite adjustments being made for gender, plaque scores and age.Conclusions The systematic review demonstrates a very low level of certainty in evidence to point towards second-hand smoke exposure of children up to 15 years of age leads to higher GI scores as compared to their unexposed counterparts. Even though no differences have been demonstrated in terms of PPD, there is a necessity for further research to draw conclusions on other pertinent periodontal parameters such as bleeding on probing and clinical attachment loss.

The association between secondhand smoke and childhood asthma: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Secondhand Smoking Increases Bladder Cancer Risk in Nonsmoking Population: a Meta-Analysis

Risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease associated with secondhand smoke exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Health effects associated with exposure to secondhand smoke: a Burden of Proof study

"Inhaling hazards, exhaling insights: a systematic review unveiling the silent health impacts of secondhand smoke pollution on children and adolescents

Dose-related effect of secondhand smoke on cardiovascular disease in nonsmokers: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Association between second-hand smoke exposure and lung cancer risk in never-smokers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Smoke exposure and childhood atopic eczema and food allergy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Secondhand smoke exposure among never-smoking adolescents in Wuhan, China

Association between prenatal or postpartum exposure to tobacco smoking and allergic rhinitis in the offspring: An updated meta-analysis of nine cohort studies

The associations of secondhand smoke exposure with neurodevelopmental disorders and critical time window identification: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Effects of in utero and Postnatal Exposure to Secondhand Smoke on Lung Function by Gender and Asthma Status: The Seven Northeastern Cities (SNEC) Study

Secondhand Smoke From Multiple Sources, Thirdhand Smoke and Respiratory Symptoms in Hong Kong Adolescents

Outdoor air pollution and the risk of asthma exacerbations in single lag0 and lag1 exposure patterns: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Secondhand smoke exposure and ocular health: A systematic review

The association between second-hand smoke and the periodontal status of children and adolescents

Early-life exposure to PM2.5 constituents and childhood asthma and wheezing: Findings from China, Children, Homes, Health study

Association between Second-Hand Exposure to E-Cigarettes at Home and Exacerbations in Children with Asthma

Household second-hand smoke exposure and stunted growth among Chinese school-age children

Health Impacts of Wildfire Smoke on Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

[Secondhand smoke exposure and its influencing factors among Chinese people aged 15 years and above in 2010 and 2018]