A meta-analysis of healthy lifestyle interventions addressing quality of life of cancer survivors in the post treatment phase

Morgan Leske,Christina Galanis,Bogda Koczwara,Lisa Beatty

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-023-01514-x

2024-01-13

Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Abstract:This study's primary aim was to investigate whether including a mental health component to healthy lifestyle interventions are associated with greater effects on quality of life (QoL) for post-treatment cancer survivors than addressing physical activity and/or nutrition alone.

oncology,social issues

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main purpose of this paper is to explore whether adding a mental health component to healthy lifestyle interventions can have a greater positive impact on the quality of life (QoL) of cancer survivors after treatment than interventions that only focus on physical activity and/or nutrition. Specifically, the study evaluated the effects of healthy lifestyle interventions on overall post - treatment quality of life, physical, emotional, and social well - being compared to control groups (usual care or wait - list control) through meta - analysis methods. In addition, the study also conducted subgroup analyses to compare the effects of interventions with and without a mental health component, different delivery modes (such as face - to - face, online, etc.), and intervention duration (within 12 weeks vs. more than 13 weeks) on quality of life.

### Research Background
With the progress of early cancer detection and diagnosis techniques, the improvement of treatment options, and better supportive care, the number of cancer survivors is constantly increasing. However, the physiological (such as fatigue, pain, nausea, and appearance changes) and psychosocial (such as psychological distress, interpersonal challenges, economic pressure, and changes in cognitive and sexual function) side effects brought by cancer diagnosis and its related treatments may significantly affect an individual's quality of life for a long time after the end of treatment. Quality of life is a multi - dimensional concept that encompasses an individual's physical, emotional, social, and spiritual well - being as well as functional status, reflecting an individual's perception of their life in the context of their health and personal values, and their ability to participate in important activities.

### Research Objectives
This article aims to systematically evaluate the effects of healthy lifestyle interventions (including physical activity, nutrition, and/or weight management) on the quality of life of cancer survivors after treatment through meta - analysis methods, and specifically focuses on whether the addition of a mental health component can enhance the effects of these interventions.

### Methods
The research team identified relevant randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of healthy lifestyle interventions on the quality of life of cancer survivors after treatment by searching multiple databases (PsycINFO, Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, and Google Scholar). The study used the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool to assess the quality of the included studies and used a random - effects model to calculate the standardized mean difference (Hedge’s g) and its 95% confidence interval to evaluate the difference in effects between the intervention and control groups.

### Results
A total of 88 papers were included in the study, evaluating 110 interventions. The meta - analysis results showed that healthy lifestyle interventions had small but significant positive effects on improving the overall quality of life (g = 0.32, p > 0.001), physical well - being (g = 0.19, p = 0.05), emotional well - being (g = 0.20, p > 0.001), and social well - being (g = 0.18, p = 0.01) of cancer survivors. However, the inclusion of a mental health component had no significant impact on the effects. Face - to - face delivered interventions performed better in overall quality of life and physical well - being, and interventions with a duration of no more than 12 weeks had better effects on physical well - being.

### Conclusions
The study shows that participating in healthy lifestyle interventions after cancer treatment can improve quality of life, especially for survivors who hope to improve their physical well - being. Future research should develop and evaluate more interventions using online or telephone modes and pay more attention to the integration of mental health components.