Variety-Selective Rhizospheric Activation, Uptake, and Subcellular Distribution of Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) in Lettuce ( Lactuca sativa L.)
Peng-Fei Yu,Yan-Wen Li,Long-Jun Zou,Bai-Lin Liu,Lei Xiang,Hai-Ming Zhao,Hui Li,Quan-Ying Cai,Xue-Wen Hou,Ce-Hui Mo,Ming Hung Wong,Qing X. Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c01175
2021-06-25
Abstract:Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) as an accumulative emerging persistent organic pollutant in crops poses severe threats to human health. Lettuce varieties that accumulate a lower amount of PFOS (low-accumulating crop variety, LACV) have been identified, but the regarding mechanisms remain unsolved. Here, rhizospheric activation, uptake, translocation, and compartmentalization of PFOS in LACV were investigated in comparison with those of high-accumulating crop variety (HACV) in terms of rhizospheric forms, transporters, and subcellular distributions of PFOS. The enhanced PFOS desorption from the rhizosphere soils by dissolved organic matter from root exudates was observed with weaker effect in LACV than in HACV. PFOS root uptake was controlled by a transporter-mediated passive process in which low activities of aquaporins and rapid-type anion channels were corrected with low expression levels of <i>PIPs</i> (<i>PIP1–1</i> and <i>PIP2–2</i>) and <i>ALMTs</i> (<i>ALMT10</i> and <i>ALMT13</i>) genes in LACV roots. Higher PFOS proportions in root cell walls and trophoplasts caused lower root-to-shoot transport in LACV. The ability to cope with PFOS toxicity to shoot cells was poorer in LACV relative to HACV since PFOS proportions were higher in chloroplasts but lower in vacuoles. Our findings provide novel insights into PFOS accumulation in lettuce and further understanding of multiprocess mechanisms of LACV.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c01175?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c01175</a>.Table S1, physicochemical properties of potting soil; Table S2, the concentration of PFOS in unplanted soils; Table S3, chemical compositions and concentrations of the used nutrient solution; Table S4, the concentration of PFOS in nutrient solution; Table S5, the primer sequences used for qPCR analysis; Table S6, optimal HPLC-MS/MS parameters; Table S7, method of detection limits and recoveries of PFOS; Table S8, DOC concentration; Table S9, two-way ANOVA on DOC concentration; Table S10, parameters of uptake kinetics; Figure S1, PFOS toxicity to the two lettuce varieties; Figure S2, biomass and PFOS concentration; Figure S3, correlation between DOC and PFOS concentration; Figure S4, PFOS concentrations of rhizospheric fractions; Figure S5, proportions of PFOS fractions in the rhizosphere soils; Figure S6, PFOS concentrations in various subcellular fractions; Figure S7, biomass and PFOS amount of roots in time-dependent experiment; Figure S8, PFOS concentration of shoots in time-dependent experiment; Figure S9, biomass and PFOS amount of roots in concentration-dependent experiment; and Figure S10 effect of AgNO<sub>3</sub> on PFOS uptake (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.est.1c01175/suppl_file/es1c01175_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental