Mitigation of ammonia, nitrous oxide and methane emissions during solid waste composting with different additives: A meta-analysis

Yubo Cao,Xuan Wang,Zhaohai Bai,David Chadwick,Tom Misselbrook,Sven G. Sommer,Wei Qin,Lin Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.288
IF: 11.1
2019-10-01
Journal of Cleaner Production
Abstract:<p>Composting of solid waste can be associated with a loss of the agronomic value (nutrient loss), as well as a source of environmental impact through the emission of the greenhouse gases (GHG) nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O) and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and volatilization of ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>). Additives have been considered as a useful option to mitigate these environmental emissions, but the wider effects of using different additives on multiple gas emissions is still uncertain. Here, a global meta-analysis was conducted using 105 studies with 303 paired comparisons, to quantify the impact of different additives on NH<sub>3</sub> and GHG emissions, considering different composting feedstock properties. On average, additives reduced the total nitrogen (TN) loss (46.4%), NH<sub>3</sub> (44.5%), N<sub>2</sub>O (44.6%) and CH<sub>4</sub> (68.5%) emissions, and total GHG emissions expressed as global warming potential (GWP) (54.2%) during composting. Chemical, physical and microbial additives all significantly reduced TN loss and NH<sub>3</sub> emission; however, the strongest effect was observed for chemical additives under the condition of low moisture content (≤65%), low C/N ratios (≤20) or alkalinity (pH &gt; 7.5). Specifically, PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> salt had the greatest mean mitigation for TN loss (68.0%) and NH<sub>3</sub> emission (62.0%). In contrast, physical additives (e.g. biochar and zeolite) were more effective at reducing the total GHG emissions (67.2%) compared with chemical additives because of the greater mitigation of N<sub>2</sub>O emission. Low moisture content (≤65%) or low C/N ratios (≤20) enhanced the effectiveness of chemical additives in reducing TN loss and NH<sub>3</sub> emission. Physical additives were suggested to be more effective in reducing N<sub>2</sub>O emission at low moisture content (≤65%) or high C/N ratios (&gt;20 to ≤ 30). The magnitude of the mitigation of TN loss and NH<sub>3</sub> emission increased as the dosage rate of PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup> and Mg<sup>2+</sup> salt/superphosphate increased between 0 and 20%. This meta-analysis suggests that an optimized combination of chemical and physical additives tailored to feedstock characteristics and application dosage may be a promising approach for the synergistic mitigation of NH<sub>3</sub> and GHG emissions.</p>
environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental
What problem does this paper attempt to address?