Variability in combinations of APTT reagent and substrate plasma for a one‐stage clotting assay to measure factor VIII products

Atsuo Suzuki,Nobuaki Suzuki,Takeshi Kanematsu,Shuichi Okamoto,Naruko Suzuki,Shogo Tamura,Ryosuke Kikuchi,Akira Katsumi,Tetsuhito Kojima,Tadashi Matsushita
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.14258
2024-03-02
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
Abstract:Introduction An investigation of the suitability of reagents for measuring FVIII products in a one‐stage clotting assay (OSA) showed variations in their FVIII activity (FVIII:C). Most studies have focused on the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagent rather than FVIII‐deficient plasma (F8DP), even though the APTT‐based OSA is comprised of APTT reagents and factor‐deficient plasma. Aim A single‐centre study was conducted to clarify variations in measurements of FVIII products in an OSA using a total of 12 reagent combinations, including four APTT reagents and three types of F8DP. Methods FVIII:C in nine types of FVIII product‐spiked plasma was measured using an OSA with four different APTT reagents and three types of F8DP. Results F8DP‐dependent variations were found in addition to differences derived from APTT reagents. Variations in target recovery (TR) were observed for NovoEight®, Eloctate®, and Jivi®. Reduced TR for Jivi was found only for Pathromtin SL in combination with congenital F8DP (F8DP‐3). This lower TR was not observed with alternative manufacturing lots of F8DP‐3. The reduced TR for Jivi might be related to impaired contact activation due to lower factor XI activity in F8DP‐3. Conclusion In addition to APTT reagents, variations in F8DPs used for OSAs can also affect FVIII:C results. F8DPs as well as the APTT reagent used for OSA should be chosen with caution, and laboratories should evaluate reagents for F8DPs as they currently do for APTT reagents, especially when lot changes occur.
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?