Quantified Metrics of Gastric Emptying Delay by GLP-1 Agonists: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Insights for Periprocedural Management

Brent Hiramoto,Thomas R McCarty,Nayna A Lodhia,Andrew Jenkins,Ahmed Elnaiem,Mayssan Muftah,Ryan Flanagan,Walter W Chan,Thomas R. McCarty,Nayna A. Lodhia,Walter W. Chan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002820
2024-04-19
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Abstract:Introduction: Divergent recommendations for periprocedural management of GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) medications rely on limited evidence. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide quantitative measures of gastric emptying relevant to mechanisms of weight loss and to periprocedural management of GLP-1 RA. We hypothesized that the magnitude of gastric emptying delay would be low and of limited clinical significance to procedural sedation risks. Methods: A protocolized search identified studies on GLP-1 RA that quantified gastric emptying measures. Pooled estimates using random effects were presented as weighted mean difference with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Univariate meta-regression was performed to assess the influence of GLP-1 RA type, short- vs long-acting mechanism of action, and duration of treatment on gastric emptying. Results: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria. Five studies (n=247) utilized scintigraphy (GES). Mean T 1/2 was 138.4 minutes (CI:74.5-202.3) for GLP-1 RA versus 95.0 minutes (CI:54.9-135.0) for placebo, with pooled mean difference of 36.0 minutes (CI:17.0-55.0, p<0.01, I 2 =79.4%). Ten studies (n=411) utilized the acetaminophen absorption test (AAT), with no significant delay in gastric emptying measured by T max , AUC 4hr , and AUC 5hr with GLP-1 RA (p>0.05). On meta-regression, type of GLP-1 RA, mechanism of action, and treatment duration did not impact gastric emptying (p>0.05). Conclusions: While a gastric emptying delay of ∼36 minutes is quantifiable on GLP-1 RA medications, it is of limited magnitude relative to standard periprocedural fasting periods. There were no substantial differences in gastric emptying on modalities reflective of liquid emptying (AAT), particularly at time points relevant to periprocedural care.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?