Which is the Worst-Case Nash Equilibrium?

Thomas Lücking,Marios Mavronicolas,Burkhard Monien,Paul G. Spirakis,Imrich Vrto
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/22m1542635
IF: 0.868
2024-06-07
SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics
Abstract:SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, Volume 38, Issue 2, Page 1701-1732, June 2024. A Nash equilibrium of a routing game is a stable state where no (randomizing) user could benefit from a unilateral deviation. We consider the simplest case of the parallel links network, where links are related. The Social Cost of a Nash equilibrium is the expected maximum latency. We seek the worst-case Nash equilibrium [E. Koutsoupias and C. H. Papadimitriou, Comput. Sci. Rev., 3 (2009), pp. 65–69], which maximizes Social Cost. We continue the study of the fully mixed Nash equilibrium conjecture, abbreviated as the FMNE Conjecture, stating that the worst-case Nash equilibrium is the fully mixed Nash equilibrium, where each user assigns strictly positive probability to every link. Through an extensive combinatorial analysis, we confirm the FMNE Conjecture for the two basic cases where there are either (i) two users on related links, or (ii) many users on two identical links.
mathematics, applied
What problem does this paper attempt to address?