Abstract:Background Extended depth of focus intraocular lenses (EDOF-IOLs) provide unaided far- and mid-range vision. Refractive IOLs, in contrast to diffractive designs, are associated with a lower depth of focus and absence of dysphotopsia. The aim of this study was to assess spectacle independence for far-range, mid-range, and near-vision activities in patients after implantation of refractive or diffractive EDOF-IOLs using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a real-world setting. Patients and Methods In 2021 and 2022, all patients in a single center referred for bilateral cataract surgery were assigned to 7 experienced cataract surgeons who either bilaterally implanted only a diffractive EDOF-IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, AT LARA Jena, Germany, three surgeons) or refractive EDOF-IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision Inc., Tecnis Eyhance Irvine, California, USA, four surgeons) at the surgeon's discretion, with the aim of bilateral emmetropia. Six months after both cataract surgeries, all patients were contacted by telephone and asked to report their outcomes using a structured questionnaire investigating their spectacle usage for various daily activities and their experience with night glare or halos. Inclusion criteria were a normal postoperative visual potential based on the preoperative examination and completion of the questionnaire regarding postoperative visual experience. Results Of the patients, 514 underwent bilateral cataract surgery aiming for bilateral emmetropia with the implantation of EDOF-IOLs (422 with Tecnis Eyhance and 92 with AT LARA). A complete questionnaire was obtained from 472 (92%) patients, who were included in the study (393 vs. 79). Comparing Tecnis Eyhance with AT LARA IOL, 54 vs. 57% patients were able to perform most of their daily activities without spectacles, 9 vs. 19% reported not being dependent on spectacles at all, 25 vs. 29% reported using their smartphones without spectacles, 15 vs. 49% patients reported experiencing glares or halos at night, and 1 vs.15% with driving disturbance. Overall, 95 vs. 93% patients described themselves as "satisfied" or "highly satisfied" with their IOL. Conclusions With both types of EDOF-IOLs, the majority of patients could perform most of their daily activities without spectacles, except reading, and were highly satisfied with their IOLs. Patients with diffractive Zeiss AT LARA EDOF-IOLs were more likely to accomplish unaided near-range visual tasks; however, they were also at a higher risk of experiencing glares or halos at night. Hintergrund Extended Depth of Focus Intraokularlinsen (EDOF-IOLs) ermöglichen die Brillenfreiheit im Fern- und mittleren Bereich. Refraktive IOLs sind im Gegensatz zu diffraktiven Designs mit einer geringeren Tiefenschärfe und ohne Dysphotopsie verbunden. Ziel dieser Studie war es, die Brillenunabhängigkeit von Patienten nach der Implantation von refraktiven oder diffraktiven EDOF-IOLs anhand von Patientenberichten (PROMs) im Alltag zu beurteilen. Patient und Methoden Von 2021 und 2022 wurden alle Patienten eines einzigen Zentrums 7 erfahrenen Kataraktchirurgen zugeteilt, die nach Ermessen des Chirurgen entweder nur eine diffraktive EDOF-IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, AT LARA, 3 Chirurgen) oder eine refraktive EDOF-IOL (Johnson & Johnson Vision Inc., Tecnis Eyhance, 4 Chirurgen) mit dem Ziel einer beidseitigen Emmetropie implantierten. Sechs Monate nach beiden Kataraktoperationen wurden alle Patienten telefonisch kontaktiert und ihre Erfahrungen bez. Brillennutzung bei verschiedenen täglichen Aktivitäten sowie mit nächtlicher Blendung oder Halos wurden anhand eines strukturierten Fragebogens erhoben. Einschlusskriterien waren ein normales postoperatives Sehvermögen auf der Grundlage der präoperativen Untersuchung und das Ausfüllen des Fragebogens zum postoperativen Seherlebnis. Ergebnisse 514 Patienten erhielten eine beidseitige Kataraktoperation mit dem Ziel einer Emmetropie mit EDOF-IOLs (422 mit Tecnis Eyhance bzw. 92 mit AT LARA). Von 472 (92%) Patienten wurde ein vollständiger Fragebogen ausgefüllt und eingeschlossen (393 vs. 79). Im Vergleich zwischen Tecnis Eyhance und AT LARA IOL waren 54% vs. 57% der Patienten in der Lage, die meisten ihrer täglichen Aktivitäten ohne Brille auszuführen und 9% vs. 19% gaben an brillenfrei zu sein, 25% vs. 29% gaben an, ihr Smartphone ohne Brille zu benutzen, 15% vs. 49% berichteten, nachts geblendet zu sein oder Halos zu sehen, und 1% vs. 15%, dass sie beim Autofahren gestört sind. Insgesamt bezeichneten sich 95% vs. 93% der Patienten als "zufrieden" oder "sehr zufrieden" mit ihrer IOL. Schlussfolgerungen Mit beiden Arten von EDOF-IOLs konnte die Mehrheit die meisten ihrer Aktivitäten brillenlos ausführen, mit Ausnahme des Lese -Abstract Truncated-

Gibt es patientenrelevante Unterschiede bei Materialeigenschaften von Kunstlinsen?Are There Patient-Relevant Differences in the Material Properties of Intraocular Lenses?

Endothelzellverlust bei phaken IntraokularlinsenEndothelial Cell Loss in Patients with Phakic Intraocular Lenses

Intraocular Lens Materials: A Detailed Assessment of Benefits and Drawbacks

Long-Term Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Observation of Position Changes of A Copolymer Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens

Recent Advances of Intraocular Lens Materials and Surface Modification in Cataract Surgery

Intraoperative Komplikationen der Kataraktchirurgie

Construction aspects of intraocular artificial lenses

Physicochemical and surface properties of acrylic intraocular lenses and their clinical significance

Nano-Indentation to Determine Mechanical Properties of Intraocular Lenses: Evaluating Penetration Depth, Material Stiffness, and Elastic Moduli

Chromatic aberration and spectral dependency of extended-range-of-vision intraocular lens technology

Position-dependent accommodative shift of retropupillary fixated iris-claw lenses

Relationship Between Postoperative Intraocular Lens Shift and Postoperative Refraction Change in Cataract Surgery Using Three Different Types of Intraocular Lenses

In-vitro assessment of a novel intraocular lens made of crosslinked polyisobutylene

A comparative study of two phakic posterior chamber implantable lenses

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) with Refractive and Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) Intraocular Lenses

Are there acceptable anterior chamber intraocular lenses for clinical use in the 1990s? An analysis of 4104 explanted anterior chamber intraocular lenses

CHANGES IN THE VISION OF ADULT AMBLYOPIC PATIENTS FOLLOWING CLEAR LENS EXTRACTION

[Overview of intraocular lenses with optics for correcting presbyopia]

Changes in visual performance after implantation of different intraocular lenses

Examining Penetration and Residual Depth in Modern Acrylic Foldable Intraocular Lenses: A Laboratory Study Using Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy to Compare Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Materials

A Novel 3D High Resolution Imaging Method Using Correlative X-Ray and Electron Microscopy to Study Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser-Induced Defects in Intraocular Lenses