Accuracy of early neuroprognostication in pediatric severe traumatic brain injury

Varun Sampat,John Whitinger,Katherine Flynn-O'Brien,Irene Kim,Binod Balakrishnan,Niyati Mehta,Rachel Sawdy,Namrata D. Patel,Rupa Nallamothu,Liyun Zhang,Ke Yan,Kimberley Zvara,Raquel Farias-Moeller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.03.010
IF: 4.21
2024-03-18
Pediatric Neurology
Abstract:Background Children with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) are at risk for neurological sequelae impacting function. Clinicians are tasked with neuroprognostication to assist in decision making . We describe a single-center study assessing clinicians' neuroprognostication accuracy. Methods Clinicians of various specialties caring for children with sTBI were asked to predict their patients' functioning 3–6-month post- injury. Clinicians were asked to participate in the study if their patient had survived but not returned to baseline between day 4-7 post-injury. The outcome tool utilized was the functional status scale (FSS), ranging from 6-30 (best-worst function). Predicted scores were compared to actual scores 3-6 months post-injury. Lin's concordance correlation coefficients (CCC) were used to estimate agreement between predicted and actual FSS. Outcome was dichotomized as good (FSS 6-8) or poor (FSS ≥9). Positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) for poor outcome were calculated. Pessimistic prognostic prediction was defined as predicted worse outcome by ≥3 FSS points. Demographic and clinical variables were collected. Results One-hundred-seven surveys were collected on 24 patients. Two children died. Fifteen children had complete (FSS=6) or near-complete (FSS=7) recovery. Mean predicted and actual FSS scores were 10.8 (SD 5.6) and 8.6 (SD 4.1) respectively. Predicted FSS scores were higher than actual scores (p<0.001). Eight children had collective pessimistic prognostic prediction. Conclusions: Clinicians predicted worse functional outcomes, despite high percentage of patients with near-normal function at follow-up clinic. Certain patient and provider factors were noted to impact accuracy and need to be studied in larger cohorts.
pediatrics,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?