Stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy for brainstem metastases: An international multicenter analysis
Felix Ehret,Daniel Rueß,Oliver Blanck,Susanne Fichte,Georgios Chatzikonstantinou,Robert Wolff,Lucas Mose,Stephan Mose,Thomas Fortmann,Ralph Lehrke,Menekse Turna,Hale Basak Caglar,Farshin Mortasawi,Martin Bleif,David Krug,Maximilian I. Ruge,Christoph Fürweger,Alexander Muacevic
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.34980
2024-05-10
International Journal of Cancer
Abstract:What's New? This international multicenter study investigates the impact of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) on brainstem metastases (BSM). Our results, analyzing 136 patients with 144 BSM from nine institutions, underscore the long‐term benefits in local control and the robust safety profile despite the delicate location of the treated metastases. Based on this analysis and review of other studies, the use of stereotactic radiotherapy for BSM in prospective SRS and FSRT trials appears justified. Brainstem metastases (BSM) present a significant neuro‐oncological challenge, resulting in profound neurological deficits and poor survival outcomes. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) offer promising therapeutic avenues for BSM despite their precarious location. This international multicenter study investigates the efficacy and safety of SRS and FSRT in 136 patients with 144 BSM treated at nine institutions from 2005 to 2022. The median radiographic and clinical follow‐up periods were 6.8 and 9.4 months, respectively. Predominantly, patients with BSM were managed with SRS (69.4%). The median prescription dose and isodose line for SRS were 18 Gy and 65%, respectively, while for FSRT, the median prescription dose was 21 Gy with a median isodose line of 70%. The 12‐, 24‐, and 36‐month local control (LC) rates were 82.9%, 71.4%, and 61.2%, respectively. Corresponding overall survival rates at these time points were 61.1%, 34.7%, and 19.3%. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis for LC, only the minimum biologically effective dose was significantly associated with LC, favoring higher doses for improved control (in Gy, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86, p
oncology