Computed tomography in patients with sepsis presenting to the emergency department: exploring its role in light of patient outcomes

Julian Pohlan,Martin Möckel,Anna Slagman,Hannah Tenenbaum,Jules Stolz,Kerstin Rubarth,Johannes Winning,Michael Bauer,Konrad Reinhart,Angelika Stacke,Marc Dewey,Myrto Bolanaki
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10701-y
IF: 7.034
2024-04-11
European Radiology
Abstract:This study aimed to explore the role of CT in septic patients presenting to the emergency department (ED).
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to explore the application value of computed tomography (CT) in patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department (ED), especially its role in detecting the source of infection. The study hypothesizes that earlier CT examination (i.e., shorter time to CT examination time, ttCTsd) may improve the prognosis of sepsis patients. ### Research Background and Objectives - **Background**: Sepsis is a life - threatening organ dysfunction caused by infection. Early identification of sepsis and rapid initiation of treatment are crucial for improving patient prognosis. CT, as a rapid imaging technique, has potential value in detecting the source of infection. - **Objectives**: This article aims to explore the application value of CT in sepsis patients in the emergency department, especially the sensitivity and specificity in detecting the source of infection, and evaluate the impact of CT examination time (ttCTsd) on patient prognosis. ### Main Findings - **Sensitivity and Specificity of CT**: - Sensitivity: 81.1% (95% CI, 68.0 - 90.6%) - Specificity: 55.6% (95% CI, 21.2 - 86.3%) - **Impact of CT Examination Time (ttCTsd) on Prognosis**: - The study found that earlier CT examination did not significantly affect patient mortality, length of hospital stay, or length of intensive care stay. - Specific data: - Mortality: short ttCTsd group (16.1%, n = 5/31) and long ttCTsd group (9.7%, n = 3/31), p = 0.449 - Length of hospital stay: The median was 16 days (IQR 9 days 12 hours - 23 days 18 hours) and 13 days (IQR 10 days 00 hours - 24 days 00 hours), p = 0.863 - Length of intensive care stay: The median was 3 days 12 hours (IQR 2 days 6 hours - 7 days 18 hours) and 5 days (IQR 2 days - 11 days), p = 0.800 ### Discussion - **Value of CT**: - The research results show that CT has a high sensitivity in detecting the source of sepsis infection, but a low specificity. Therefore, CT should be mainly used for detecting the source of infection based on clinical suspicion, rather than for excluding the source of infection. - For pulmonary sources of infection, CT has a high diagnostic value, which supports previous research results. - For urinary tract sources of infection, CT has a low diagnostic value, which is consistent with other research results. - **Impact of Time to CT Examination (ttCTsd)**: - Although the study hypothesized that earlier CT examination might improve prognosis, the actual data did not show this advantage. This may be due to the fact that in the clinical decision - making process, patients with more severe conditions are more likely to be given priority for CT examination, thus introducing confounding factors. ### Conclusions - **Main Conclusions**: - CT has a high sensitivity in detecting the source of infection in sepsis patients in the emergency department, but performs poorly in terms of specificity. - Earlier CT examination did not significantly improve patient prognosis, which may be related to confounding factors in the clinical decision - making process. - CT should not be used as a tool to exclude the source of infection, but should be used on the basis of clinical suspicion. - **Clinical Significance**: - In the emergency department, CT can be used for detecting the source of infection based on clinical suspicion, but should not be the only means to exclude the source of infection. - Currently, there is a lack of scientific evidence on the optimal timing of CT examination, and more prospective randomized controlled studies are needed in the future to further explore this issue.