Evaluating conservation units using network analysis: a sea duck case study
Juliet S Lamb,Clara Cooper‐Mullin,Scott G Gilliland,Alicia M Berlin,Timothy D Bowman,W Sean Boyd,Susan EW De La Cruz,Daniel Esler,Joseph R Evenson,Paul Flint,Christine Lepage,Dustin E Meattey,Jason E Osenkowski,Peter WC Paton,Matthew C Perry,Dan Rosenberg,Jean‐Pierre L Savard,Lucas Savoy,Jason Schamber,David H Ward,John Y Takekawa,Scott R McWilliams
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2648
2024-01-11
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Abstract:Conserving migratory wildlife requires understanding how groups of individuals interact across seasons and landscapes. Telemetry reveals individual movements at large spatiotemporal scales; however, using movement data to define conservation units requires scaling up from individual movements to species‐ and community‐level patterns. We developed a framework to define flyways and identify important sites from telemetry data and applied it to long‐term, range‐wide tracking data from three species (640 individuals) of sea ducks: namely, North American scoters (Melanitta spp). Our network of 88 nodes included both multispecies hotspots and areas uniquely important to individual species. We found limited spatial overlap between scoters wintering on the Atlantic and Pacific coasts of North America, with differing connectivity patterns between coasts. Finally, we identified four multispecies conservation units that did not correspond to traditional management flyways. From this approach, we show how individual movements can be used to quantify range‐wide connectivity of migratory species and reveal gaps in conservation strategies.
environmental sciences,ecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?