Cross‐reactivity between thiuram disulfides and dithiocarbamates. A study of TETD and ZDEC using mouse models

Christoffer Kursawe Larsen,Anders Boutrup Funch,Helen Vaher,Rebecca Kitt Davidson Lohmann,Mia Hamilton Jee,Jakob F. B. Schwensen,Claus Zachariae,Cecilia Svedman,Ola Bergendorff,Charlotte Menné Bonefeld,Jeanne D. Johansen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14706
2024-09-29
Contact Dermatitis
Abstract:When mice are sensitized with ZDEC or TETD, a significant cross‐reaction occurs between both chemicals with an increased ear thickness after challenge. Cross‐reactivity reactions were also observed in the submandibular and cervical draining lymph nodes with proliferation of both CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells when TETD‐sensitized mice were challenged with ZDEC. The proliferative T cell response was not observed when ZDEC‐sensitized mice were challenged with TETD. This indicates cross‐reactivity between TETD and ZDEC. Background Rubber accelerators are used in the vulcanization of rubber. However, rubber accelerators for example tetraethylthiuram disulfide (TETD) and zinc diethyldithiocarbamate (ZDEC) may cause contact allergy. Concomitant reactions between ZDEC and TETD have been observed in patients which could be explained by co‐ or cross‐reactivity. Objectives To investigate cross‐reactivity between TETD and ZDEC and vice versa. Methods Groups of mice were sensitized with TETD or ZDEC based on reported EC3‐values. Proliferation of lymphocytes were measured on day 5. To test cross‐reactivity, mice were sensitized and challenged 3 weeks later with TETD or ZDEC. The inflammatory response was measured by changes in ear thickness and the proliferative response in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the submandibular and cervical draining lymph nodes. Results Sensitization of mice with doses of ZDEC 3%, TETD 5.6% or TETD 16.2% induced significant increased ear thickness and proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Challenge with ZDEC or TETD in these groups induced significant increased ear thickness. Challenge with ZDEC in mice sensitized to TETD 5.6% or TETD 16.2% induced significant increased proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Conclusions We show cross‐reactivity between TETD and ZDEC. Patients sensitized to TETD or ZDEC should avoid exposure to both ZDEC and TETD.
dermatology,allergy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?