Game Model of Blockchain Adoption and Product Pricing in Retail Supply Chain
JI Qing-kai,ZHANG Feng-lin,FANG Gang,HU Xiang-pei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.0315
2023-01-01
Abstract:Recently, food contamination incidents have occurred frequently. To deal with food safety issues and enhance brand image, many large retail companies（e.g., Walmart） have deployed blockchain technology to improve the transparency of their supply chains., which can make the source traceable and the responsibility accountable. Since then, retailers have begun to encourage more suppliers to join their own blockchain platforms. However, when there is competition among suppliers, suppliers must not only weigh the advantages（brand image enhancement） and disadvantages（cost） of joining the blockchain platform, but also consider the multi-party game with competitors and retailers. Therefore, it is meaningful to study the participation incentive and preference of supply chain members for blockchain.Motivated by retailers’ practice, a supply chain consisting of two suppliers and a large retailer is considered, in which the retailer has built a blockchain platform for tracing products, the suppliers may choose to join this blockchain platform（abbreviates “join the chain”） to enhance their product images and attract more consumers. The suppliers have different brand image initially, let H represents the high image supplier, while L the low image supplier. Aiming at the problem of whether the suppliers should “join the chain” and how to price, a dynamic game model of blockchain adoption and product pricing（including wholesale prices and retail prices） is built, and the game equilibriums and the profit distributions are characterized under four different blockchain adoption scenarios. The incentives of suppliers joining the chain and the retailer’s preference to scenarios are analyzed.（i） Results show that the retailer’s profit will increase when only L “joins the chain”, but it may decrease when only H “joins the chain”. Moreover, H “joining the chain” can benefit L, while L “joining the chain” will hurt H. However, H and L both “join the chain” is not necessarily beneficial to themselves, it depends on the production cost of products, the degree of brand difference and the impact of blockchain on consumers’ valuation of product.（ⅱ） Compared with only L “joining the chain”, both H and L “joining the chain” will benefit both parties, but the retailer may suffer.（ⅲ） Compared with only H “joining the chain ”, both H and L “joining the chain” will benefit retailers, but H will suffer and L may suffer as well. Compared with H and L both “not joining the chain”, both H and L “joining the chain” at the same time may benefit all parties.（ⅳ） Based on the basic model, the influence of production cost difference and the impact of positive blockchain variable cost are discussed, and it is found that our conclusions are robust under mild conditions. The conclusions of this study provide useful managerial implications for managing retail supply chain under the background of blockchain.