Temporal and spatial variability of dynamic microstate brain network in disorders of consciousness

Yaqian Li,Junfeng Gao,Ying Yang,Yvtong Zhuang,Qianruo Kang,Xiang Li,Min Tian,Haoan Lv,Jianghong He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cns.14641
2024-02-23
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
Abstract:This is the first study to explore the temporal and spatial variability of dynamic microstate brain networks in disorders of consciousness. Our findings suggest that constructing features based on microstates to distinguish between two categories of disorders of consciousness (DOC) patients has effectiveness. The stronger activation of specific brain regions in different microstates in vegetative state patients suggests that their level of consciousness may have been underestimated. Our findings may contribute to the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying human consciousness as well as provide new insights to reveal the level of consciousness in DOC. Background Accurately diagnosing patients with the vegetative state (VS) and the minimally conscious state (MCS) reached a misdiagnosis of approximately 40%. Methods A method combined microstate and dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) to study the spatiotemporal variability of the brain in disorders of consciousness (DOC) patients was proposed. Resting‐state EEG data were obtained from 16 patients with MCS and 16 patients with VS. Mutual information (MI) was used to assess the EEG connectivity in each microstate. MI‐based features with statistical differences were selected as the total feature subset (TFS), then the TFS was utilized to feature selection and fed into the classifier, obtaining the optimal feature subsets (OFS) in each microstate. Subsequently, an OFS‐based MI functional connectivity network (MIFCN) was constructed in the cortex. Results The group‐average MI connectivity matrix focused on all channels revealed that all five microstates exhibited stronger information interaction in the MCS when comparing with the VS. While OFS‐based MIFCN, which only focused on a few channels, revealed greater MI flow in VS patients than in MCS patients under microstates A, B, C, and E, except for microstate D. Additionally, the average classification accuracy of OFS in the five microstates was 96.2%. Conclusion Constructing features based on microstates to distinguish between two categories of DOC patients had effectiveness.
pharmacology & pharmacy,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?