Assessment of soil quality indexes for different land use types in typical steppe in the loess hilly area, China

Yao Zhou,Hongbin Ma,Yingzhong Xie,Xiyang Jia,Tingting Su,Jianping Li,Yan Shen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106743
IF: 6.9
2020-11-01
Ecological Indicators
Abstract:<p>Soil quality indexes (SQIs) are important for evaluating grassland ecosystems. The objective of this study was to assess different land-use soil quality using total data set, minimum data set (MDS), and revised minimum data set (RMDS) indicator selection methods and linear and non-linear scoring methods. Four land-use, which were including grazing grassland (GG), fencing grassland (FG), contour trench grassland (CG) and fish-scale pits grassland (FPG) in a typical steppe of loess hilly area in Ningxia, were taken as the research object. Eighteen indicators (soil bulk density; GMD: geometric mean diameter; MWD: mean weight diameter; FWC: field water-storage capacity; capillary porosity; total porosity; soil organic carbon; TN: total nitrogen; total phosphorus; AK: available potassium; available nitrogen; microbial biomass carbon; microbial biomass nitrogen; SA: sucrase activity; protease activity; CA: catalase activity; PPA: phosphatase activity; and urease activity) of soil physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of the 0–40 cm soil layer under different land use types were measured. Principal component analysis was used to select the MDS and RMDS. The results showed that three (SA, MWD, and PPA) and six (FWC, GMD, TN, AK, SA, and CA) soil indicators were included in the MDS and RMDS, respectively. The agreement values of SQIs for the linear scoring method were higher than those of the non-linear scoring method. The linear scoring-revised minimum data set was regarded as the most appropriate method to calculate the SQI because of its highest F and CV (Coefficient of Variation) values and correlation coefficient. The ranking of the SQI values of the four land use types was FG &gt; GG &gt; CG &gt; FPG. The results showed that FG is the most beneficial measure for the restoration of degraded grassland, which has important guiding significance for the ecological construction of degraded grassland in the study area.</p>
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper primarily explores the impact of different land use types on soil quality in a typical grassland area of the Loess Plateau in China and evaluates the effectiveness of several different soil quality index (SQI) calculation methods. ### Research Background and Objectives - **Study Area**: The study area is located in a typical grassland region of the hilly area of the Loess Plateau in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China. - **Study Subjects**: Four different land use types were included in the study, including Grazing Grassland (GG), Fenced Grassland (FG), Contour Trench Grassland (CG), and Fish Scale Pit Grassland (FPG). - **Research Objectives**: - To evaluate soil quality under different land use types using comprehensive data set (TDS), minimum data set (MDS), and revised minimum data set (RMDS) indicator selection methods, as well as linear and nonlinear scoring methods. - To determine the most suitable SQI, indicator selection method, and scoring method. - To explore the impact of different land use practices on soil quality. ### Main Findings - By analyzing 18 soil indicators (physical, chemical, and biological properties), the paper identified three different data sets to calculate SQI. - Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to select indicators in MDS and RMDS. - The consistency value of SQI obtained by the linear scoring method was higher than that of the nonlinear scoring method. - The linear scoring-revised minimum data set was considered the most appropriate method for calculating SQI because it had the highest F-value, coefficient of variation (CV), and correlation coefficient. - The soil quality index ranking was: Fenced Grassland (FG) > Grazing Grassland (GG) > Contour Trench Grassland (CG) > Fish Scale Pit Grassland (FPG). - The results indicated that fenced grassland is the most beneficial land management measure for the restoration of degraded grassland. ### Experimental Methods - **Sampling**: 40 soil samples were collected from each land use type for the determination of physical, chemical, and biological properties. - **Data Analysis**: One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), principal component analysis (PCA), and linear and nonlinear scoring methods were used to process the data. ### Conclusion This study provides important information on how different land use practices affect soil quality and proposes an effective soil quality assessment framework, which is of great significance for guiding local ecological construction and sustainable grassland development.