Low Dose Vasopressin Infusion Post-Cardiopulmonary Bypass In Patients With Left Ventricular Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Rajarajan Ganesan,Kajori Chakraborty,Indranil Biswas,Sunder Negi,Anand Mishra,Pankaj Agarwal,Krishna Prasad Gourav
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.09.094
IF: 2.894
2024-10-27
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Abstract:Objective The usefulness of low-dose infusion of vasopressin in patients having left ventricle(LV) dysfunction undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass(CPB) is not well studied. Our study aimed to evaluate the hemodynamic and clinical effects of low-dose vasopressin infusion in this patient population. Our primary hypothesis is that vasopressin infusion reduces the cardiac index measured at the end of CPB. Design and method This randomised double-blinded controlled trial was conducted in 36 patients of age above 18 years, planned for elective cardiac surgery with CPB and presenting with LV dysfunction preoperatively. Patients in the vasopressin group (n=18) received 1.2 units per hour of vasopressin infusion started at the end of CPB while patients in the control group (n=18) received normal saline. Hemodynamic parameters, blood gas analyses, and echocardiographic estimates of cardiac output were collected at baseline, 30 minutes post-CPB, at receiving in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and 6,12 and 24 hours after receiving in the ICU. The primary outcome was the cardiac index in the two groups at 30 minutes post-CPB. Results and conclusions Cardiac index at 30 minutes post-CPB was not statistically significantly different between the two groups(3.22±1.44 l/minute/m2 in the vasopressin group vs. 2.64±0.88 l/minute/m2 in the control group, P=0.157).The heart rate and MAP were statistically significantly higher in the vasopressin group than the control group at 6 hours after receiving in ICU (102.55±17.92 vs. 86.67±15.15 beats per minute, P=0.007 and 72.50±8.60 vs. 66.17±9.08mm Hg, P=0.039, respectively). The diastolic blood pressure was statistically significantly higher in the vasopressin group than the control group at 12 and 24 hours after receiving in ICU (69.64±8.08 vs. 63.88±8.2 mm Hg, P=0.044 at 12 hours and 70.17±6.44 vs. 61.72±5.85mm Hg, P=0.001 at 24 hours). There was no statistically significant difference in the serum lactate, mixed venous oxygen saturation and delta-partial pressure of carbon dioxide between the two groups at any time. The fluid balance at 24 hours was statistically significantly lower in the vasopressin group than in the control group (15.20±27.77 vs. 34.69±12.60 ml/kg, respectively, P=0.11). The two groups had no statistically significant difference in the mechanical ventilation duration, ICU stay and 30-day outcome. No patient developed new-onset atrial fibrillation in the postoperative period in either group.The results of the present study indicate that the use of low dose vasopressin infusion in cardiac surgical patients with left ventricle dysfunction may not reduce the cardiac index at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass. Vasopressin infusion does not affect the clinical surrogates of cardiac output and clinical outcomes.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease,respiratory system,anesthesiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?