Evaluation of Left Truncation and Censoring When Changing the Use of the International Classification of Diseases Eighth Revision Codes to Tenth Revision Codes in the Danish National Patient Registry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/clep.s456171
2024-05-19
Clinical Epidemiology
Abstract:Søren Korsgaard, Frederikke Schønfeldt Troelsen, Katalin Veres, Cecilia Hvitfeldt Fuglsang, Henrik Toft Sørensen Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark Correspondence: Søren Korsgaard, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Olof Palmes Allé 43– 45, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark, Tel +45 87167212, Email Purpose: In the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR), covering all Danish hospitals and widely used in research, diseases have been recorded using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, transitioning from the Eighth to the Tenth revision in 1994. Uncertainty exists regarding whether including ICD-8 codes alongside ICD-10 is needed for complete disease identification. We assessed the extent of left-truncation and left-censoring in the DNPR arising from omitting ICD-8 codes. Patients and Methods: We sampled 500,000 Danes ≥ 40 years of age in 1995, 2010, and 2018. From the DNPR, we identified cardiovascular, endocrine, gastrointestinal, neurological, pulmonary, rheumatic, and urogenital diseases as well as fractures. We obtained the number of people with a disease recorded with ICD-8 codes only ( ie , the ICD-8 record would be left-truncated by not using ICD-8 codes), ICD-8 plus ICD-10 codes ( ie , the ICD-8 record would be left-censored by not using ICD-8 codes), and ICD-10 codes only. For each ICD group, we calculated the proportion of people with the disease relative to the total sample ( ie , 500,000 people) and the total number of people with the disease across all ICD groups. Results: Overall, the left-truncation issue decreased over the years. Relative to all people with a disease, the left-truncated proportion was for example 59% in 1995 and < 2% in 2018 for diabetes mellitus; 93% in 1995, and 54% in 2018 for appendicitis. The left-truncation issue increased with age group for most diseases. The proportion of disease records left-censored by not using ICD-8 codes was generally low but highest for chronic diseases. Conclusion: The left-truncation issue diminished over sample years, particularly for chronic diseases, yet remained rather high for selected surgical diseases. The left-truncation issue increased with age group for most diseases. Left-censoring was overall a minor issue that primarily concerned chronic diseases. Keywords: epidemiology, methodology, bias, left-truncation, left-censoring The Nordic countries have a long-standing tradition of conducting health research by using data from registries that routinely collect individual-level data for administrative purposes. 1 These registries are useful to efficiently conduct longitudinal studies enabling the examination of risk factors, prognostic factors, and outcomes of diseases, as well as the assessment of therapy utilization, effectiveness, and safety. 2 The national patient registries form a cornerstone of health research across all Nordic countries. 3 The Finnish Hospital Discharge Register contains complete nationwide data since 1969 and has included outpatient hospital care since 1998. 4 The Swedish National Patient Register contains complete nationwide data since 1987 and has included outpatient care since 2001. 5 The Norwegian Patient Registry contains complete nationwide data on in- and outpatient care since 2008. 6 The Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) contains complete inpatient data since 1978 and has included outpatient care since 1995. 7 The DNPR is the most widely used registry in Danish health research. The Nordic national patient registries record a range of information associated with hospital contacts encompassing the date of contact, date of discharge, and associated diagnoses. 3–7 The diagnoses are coded according to the World Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (ICD): a classification system developed to promote comparisons over time and among countries. 8 In the DNPR, the ICD Eighth Revision (ICD-8) was used until the end of 1993; thereafter the Tenth Revision (ICD-10) was used. 7 Little evidence exists on whether ICD-8 codes should be included in disease-identification algorithms for complete disease identification. 9 The decision may depend on the study period; the specific variable of interest ( eg , exposure, covariables, or outcome); data availability; and the sensitivity and specificity of the ICD-8 codes recorded in the registry. Nonetheless, not using ICD-8 codes requires consideration of issues that may ensue – particularly left-censoring and left-truncation. Left-censoring -Abstract Truncated-
public, environmental & occupational health