Abstract:China's "carbon peak and neutrality" policy has thrust the convergence of corporate ecological conservation and economic progress to the forefront of sustainable development. This study, aiming to tackle the "sustainability challenge", delves into the driving forces and operative mechanisms that intertwine corporate environmental performance with financial outcomes from 2015 to 2020. Focusing on A-share listed companies in heavily polluting sectors across Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges, it categorizes formal institutional pressure into two types: command-oriented and market-driven, revealing a significantly stronger positive effect of market-based pressure compared to command-based pressure. Additionally, this research examines the distinct impacts of these institutional pressures under different conditions such as ownership structure, regional location, and executive education levels. The findings indicate that state-owned enterprises, eastern region firms, and those led by highly educated executives are more responsive to command-based pressure. Conversely, privately-owned businesses, entities in central–western regions, and those with lower executive education primarily respond to market-based pressure. Moreover, this study underscores the interplay between informal and formal institutions, observing that the influence of market-based pressure on corporate environmental–financial integration is notably amplified when public awareness of environmental protection increases, thereby highlighting social factors' pivotal role in business decision-making. In essence, this paper accentuates the significance of aligning corporate environmental and financial goals for sustainable development, offering fresh insights to academia and fostering sustainable practices and research within the corporate realm.

Land finance and firms' pollution: Evidence from China

Land Use Regulation, Land Reclamation, and Industrial Productivity: Evidence from China

Will the increase in local land-based revenues lead to an improvement in environmental quality? An empirical study through the lens of land finance in China

Environmental Regulation and Corporate Financing—Quasi-Natural Experiment Evidence from China

Green finance and corporate environmental responsibility: evidence from heavily polluting listed enterprises in China

How environmental regulations affect the development of green finance: Recent evidence from polluting firms in China

The causal effect on firm performance of China's financing-pollution emission reduction policy: Firm-level evidence

Air Pollution and Corporate Green Financial Constraints: Evidence from China's Listed Companies

Can urban land market reform mitigate industrial emissions? Environmental evidence from 257 prefecture-level cities in China

Does local government competition affect the dependence on polluting industries? Evidence from China's land market

Impact of Local Government Competition and Land Finance on Haze Pollution: Empirical Evidence from China

Does financial liberalization promote corporate environmental performance? Evidence from foreign banks' entry into China

The impact of land resource mismatch and land marketization on pollution emissions of industrial enterprises in China

Exploring the Impact of Industrial Land Price Distortion on Carbon Emission Intensity: Evidence from China

Does ecological accountability restrain the financialization of heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from China

Local governments’ environmental emphasis and corporate green innovation: evidence from China

Do Financial Constraints Curb Firms’ Efforts to Control Pollution? Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Firms

Formal Institutional Pressure and the Integration of Corporate Environmental and Financial Performance: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in Heavily Polluting Industries in China

Does green finance promote the social responsibility fulfilment of highly polluting enterprises? – empirical evidence from China

Investigating the ‘Short Pain’ and ‘Long Gain’ Effect of Environmental Regulation on Financial Performance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Polluting Firms

Environmental Regulation and Fiscal Revenue Growth: Is It Win–Win or Win–Lose?—Evidence of a Multi-Tasking Performance Evaluation System in China