Abstract:<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Information disclosure is a top priority for official responses to the 2019 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). The information published by the authorities as a response to the crisis has been a cause of great concern to the public; however, there is limited evidence of any systematic analyses of the disclosed epidemic information. This in turn has important implications for risk communication. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aimed to describe and compare the officially released content regarding the local epidemic situations and analyze the characteristics of information disclosure through local transmission for both the individual and total population levels in major cities of China. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> The 31 capital cities in mainland China were enrolled in a city-level observational study. Data were retrieved from local municipalities and health commission websites as of March 18, 2020. A checklist was employed as a rapid qualitative assessment tool to analyze the information disclosure performance of each city. Descriptive analyses and data visualizations were produced to present and compare the comparative performances of the cities. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> In total, 29 cities (93.5%) established specific COVID-19 webpages to disclose information. Among them, 12 of the city webpages were added to their corresponding municipal websites. A majority of the cities (21 of 31, 67.7%) published their first cases of infection in a timely manner on the actual day of confirmation. Regarding the information disclosures highlighted on the websites, news updates from local media or press briefings were the most prevalent (28 of 29, 96.6%), followed by epidemic surveillance (25 of 29, 86.2%) and advice for the public (25 of 29, 86.2%). Clarifications of misinformation and frequently asked questions were largely overlooked as only 2 cities provided this valuable information. The median daily update frequency of epidemic surveillance summaries was 1.2 times per day (interquartile range 1.0 to 1.3 times), and the majority of these summaries (18 of 25, 72.0%) also provided detailed information of confirmed cases. The reporting of key indicators in the epidemic surveillance summaries, as well as critical facts included in the confirmed case reports, varied substantially between cities. In general, the best performance in terms of timely reporting and the transparency of information disclosures were observed in the municipalities directly administered by the central government compared to the other cities. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Timely and effective efforts to disclose information related to the COVID-19 epidemic have been made in major cities of China. Continued improvements to local authority reporting will contribute to more effective public communication and efficient public health research responses. The development of protocols and the standardization of epidemic message templates—as well as the use of uniform operating procedures to provide regular information updates—should be prioritized to ensure a coordinated national response. </sec>

What contributes to the collaborative network of emergency information release? A case study of COVID-19 response in China

Exploring time evolution characteristics of the collaborative mode in emergency information release of public health emergencies: A network analysis of response to COVID-19 from the central government of China

Understanding the Collaborative Process and Its Effects on Perceived Outcomes during Emergency Response in China: From Perspectives of Local Government Sectors

Joining Hands to Manage Transboundary Crises: A Comparative Evaluation of Policy Collaboration for Epidemic Prevention in China during SARS and COVID-19

Coordination and modularization: the experience of the joint prevention and control mechanism to COVID emergencies in China

The Emergence of an Adaptive Response Network: the April 20, 2013 Lushan, China Earthquake

Information disclosure during the COVID-19 epidemic in China: A city-level observational study (Preprint)

Combating COVID-19 Together: China’s Collaborative Response and the Role of Business Associations

Constructing the digital ark: How China utilizes shared media to foster online information collaboration and crisis management in public emergency response

Driving the effectiveness of public health emergency management strategies through cross-departmental collaboration: Configuration analysis based on 15 cities in China

Responding to COVID-19: Community Volunteerism and Coproduction in China.

Information Disclosure During the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: City-Level Observational Study.

Emergency Response and Risk Communication Effects of Local Media during COVID-19 Pandemic in China: A Study Based on a Social Media Network

Innovate emergency governance mechanism of urban communities in response to major public health events: A qualitative study from multiple principals in Guangzhou, China

Research on emergency management of global public health emergencies driven by digital technology: A bibliometric analysis

Inter-organizational collaboration after institutional reform in China: A perspective based on the revision of the emergency plan

A big data analysis on the five dimensions of emergency management information in the early stage of COVID-19 in China

Coproducing Responses to COVID‐19 with Community‐Based Organizations: Lessons from Zhejiang Province, China

Government Information Dissemination During Public Health Emergencies: An Analysis of China's Experiences

Dynamic Evolution Analysis of the Emergency Collaboration Network for Compound Disasters: A Case Study Involving a Public Health Emergency and an Accident Disaster during COVID-19

Examining Organizational Collaboration and Resource Flows of Disaster Response System Based on a Time-Dynamic Perspective