Influence of health education on clinical parameters in type 2 diabetic subjects with and without hypertension: A longitudinal, comparative analysis in routine primary care settings

Xiu-Jing Hu,Hua-Feng Wu,Yu-Ting Li,Yi Wang,Hui Cheng,Jia-Ji Wang,Bedru H Mohammed,Isabella Tan,Harry H X Wang,Bedru H. Mohammed,Harry H.X. Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108539

IF: 8.18

2020-12-01

Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Aim</h3><p>To assess the influence of health education for type 2 diabetic patients with and without coexisting hypertension in routine primary care where intensive educational consultations were absent.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>A longitudinal cohort was constructed from 342 diabetic subjects who previously had regular exposure to face-to-face health education delivered quarterly during 2016-2017 under the national basic public health (BPH) service provision in an urbanised township in China. Clinical parameters were retrieved electronically from computerised BPH data platform at prior check-ups (2016-2017) and at the most recent check-up (2019).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>The satisfactory clinical improvements upon health education were not sustained during subsequent observational years among study subjects. A significant increase in total cholesterol (0.28 mmol/L for between-group net changes, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.01-0.55 mmol/L, <em>p</em>=0.039) were observed in diabetic subjects with coexisting hypertension. Older patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]=0.87, 95%CI=0.83-0.91, <em>p</em>&lt;0.001), males (aOR=0.50, 95%CI=0.26-0.98, <em>p</em>=0.043), and subjects with lower education level (aOR=0.34, 95%CI=0.17-0.67, <em>p</em>=0.002) were less likely to maintain improvement of biomedical parameters.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusion</h3><p>The influence of face-to-face health education may not be prolonged in routine primary care where intensive provisions of educational consultations were less common. Diabetic patients with coexisting hypertension tend to have more difficulties in maintaining optimal lipid profiles. (200 words)</p>

endocrinology & metabolism

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper attempts to address whether face-to-face health education in a routine primary care setting can have a lasting impact on clinical parameters for patients with type 2 diabetes (with or without hypertension). The study particularly focuses on whether the short-term improvements brought by health education can be maintained over the following years without continuous intensive educational counseling. Additionally, the study explores how sociodemographic factors influence patients' ability to maintain improvements in clinical parameters.

**Main Findings:**
- The study indicates that the effects of health education for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients (with or without hypertension) cannot be sustained in the long term without additional intensive educational support.
- Although diabetic patients with hypertension experience a greater reduction in blood pressure in the short term, their blood pressure tends to rise again in the subsequent years.
- Diabetic patients with hypertension face more difficulties in maintaining lipid levels, particularly total cholesterol levels.
- Older age, male gender, and lower educational attainment are associated with greater difficulty in maintaining improvements in clinical parameters.

Through these findings, the paper emphasizes the need to further optimize healthcare services in routine primary care settings, especially when dealing with high-risk groups who struggle to maintain ideal health conditions, such as diabetic patients with hypertension.