Cardiac damage predicts the outcome of calcific aortic valve disease regardless of the severity of aortic stenosis

M K Moore,G T Jones,G Whalley,B D Prendergast,M J A Williams,S Coffey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1881

IF: 39.3

2024-10-30

European Heart Journal

Abstract:Title: Cardiac damage predicts the outcome of patients with calcific aortic valve disease in both mild and moderate aortic stenosis Background Although the burden of calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is increasing, there is no current universal consensus for prognostic prediction. A staging system based on cardiac damage has been proposed to better stratify risk and evaluate the benefit of aortic valve intervention (AVI). Purpose We sought to evaluate this staging system's prognostic value in mild and moderate aortic stenosis (AS). Methods Data from clinically indicated echocardiograms performed between 2010 and 2018 in patients aged over 18 years were extracted and linked to national outcome data. A time to first event analysis was performed with a primary outcome of mortality or heart failure hospitalization. Stages were categorized as described in previous literature: no extravalvular damage (stage 0); left ventricular damage (stage 1); left atrial damage (stage 2); elevated right ventricular pressures (stage 3); or right ventricular damage (stage 4). Results Amongst 24,699 patients in the study cohort, 513 had moderate AS and 920 had mild AS. Associated cardiac damage in those with moderate AS was graded as follows: Stage 0 - 9.4%; Stage 1 - 53.7%; Stage 2 - 31.1%; Stage 3 - 3.2%; Stage 4 - 2.6%. Increasing severity of CAVD correlated closely with increased risk of the primary outcome in both moderate (HR 1.62 per stage; 95% CI 1.36 – 1.92) and mild AS (HR 1.93 per stage; 95% CI 1.69 – 2.21), whilst increasing stage of cardiac damage was associated with mortality when censoring at the time of AVI in both moderate (HR 1.97 per stage; 95% CI 1.66 – 2.34) and mild AS (HR 2.06 per stage; 95% CI 1.81 – 2.35). Conclusion Cardiac dysfunction predicts prognosis to a similar extent in both mild and moderate AS. These data suggest that adverse outcomes may not be fully attributable to the haemodynamic consequences of valve disease, and therefore may not be reversed by valve intervention. Strategies to treat cardiac dysfunction in parallel with management of the anatomical valve pathology may be required.Mortality in mild AS by CAVD stageMortality in moderate AS by CAVD stage

cardiac & cardiovascular systems