Abstract:Introduction/objective: Suppression of the SOS response in combination with drugs damaging DNA has been proposed as a potential target to tackle antimicrobial resistance. The SOS response is the pathway used to repair bacterial DNA damage induced by antimicrobials such as quinolones. The extent of lexA-regulated protein expression and other associated systems under pressure of agents that damage bacterial DNA in clinical isolates remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of this strategy consisting on suppression of the SOS response in combination with quinolones on the proteome profile of Escherichia coli clinical strains. Materials and methods: Five clinical isolates of E. coli carrying different chromosomally- and/or plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance mechanisms with different phenotypes were selected, with E. coli ATCC 25922 as control strain. In addition, from each clinical isolate and control, a second strain was created, in which the SOS response was suppressed by deletion of the recA gene. Bacterial inocula from all 12 strains were then exposed to 1xMIC ciprofloxacin treatment (relative to the wild-type phenotype for each isogenic pair) for 1 h. Cell pellets were collected, and proteins were digested into peptides using trypsin. Protein identification and label-free quantification were done by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) in order to identify proteins that were differentially expressed upon deletion of recA in each strain. Data analysis and statistical analysis were performed using the MaxQuant and Perseus software. Results: The proteins with the lowest expression levels were: RecA (as control), AphA, CysP, DinG, DinI, GarL, PriS, PsuG, PsuK, RpsQ, UgpB and YebG; those with the highest expression levels were: Hpf, IbpB, TufB and RpmH. Most of these expression alterations were strain-dependent and involved DNA repair processes and nucleotide, protein and carbohydrate metabolism, and transport. In isolates with suppressed SOS response, the number of underexpressed proteins was higher than overexpressed proteins. Conclusion: High genomic and proteomic variability was observed among clinical isolates and was not associated with a specific resistant phenotype. This study provides an interesting approach to identify new potential targets to combat antimicrobial resistance.

RpoS role in antibiotic resistance, tolerance and persistence in E. coli natural isolates

Defining the regulatory mechanisms of sigma factor RpoS degradation in Azotobacter vinelandii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The Stringent Response Gene Rsh Plays Multiple Roles in Novosphingobium Pentaromativorans US6-1's Accommodation to Different Environmental Pollutants: Phenanthrene, Copper and Nzvi

Role of RpoS in stress resistance, quorum sensing and spoilage potential of Pseudomonas fluorescens

RpoE is a Putative Antibiotic Resistance Regulator of Salmonella enteric Serovar Typhi

Control of rpoS transcription in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas: why so different?

An extracytoplasmic function sigma factor cotranscribed with its cognate anti-sigma factor confers tolerance to NaCl, ethanol and methylene blue in Azospirillum brasilense Sp7

Physiological Roles of an -specific σ Factor

Transcriptomic and phenotype analysis revealed the role of rpoS in stress resistance and virulence of a novel ST3355 ESBL-producing hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate

RpoS acts as a global repressor of virulence gene expression in E. coli O104:H4 and enteroaggregative E. coli

Role of RelA-synthesized (p)ppGpp and ROS-induced mutagenesis in de novo acquisition of antibiotic resistance in E. coli

New layers of regulation of the general stress response sigma factor RpoS

Regulatory roles of RpoS in the biosynthesis of antibiotics 2,4-diacetyphloroglucinol and pyoluteorin of Pseudomonas protegens FD6

Role of (p)ppGpp in antibiotic resistance, tolerance, persistence and survival in Firmicutes

RpoS and the bacterial general stress response

Heterogeneity of SOS response expression in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli influences adaptation to antimicrobial stress

A negative feedback loop is critical for recovery of RpoS after stress in Escherichia coli

RpoE promotes invasion and intracellular survival by regulating SPI-1 and SPI-2 in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi

The stress sigma factor σS/RpoS counteracts Fur repression of genes involved in iron and manganese metabolism and modulates the ionome of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium

Impact of suppression of the SOS response on protein expression in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli under antimicrobial pressure of ciprofloxacin

Inactivation of alternative sigma factor 54 (RpoN) leads to increased acid resistance, and alters locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) expression in Escherichia coli O157 : H7