Abstract:Multiple regression analyses were performed on a worldwide 236—site data set compiled from studies that compared species composition, aboveground net primary production (ANPP), root biomass, and soil nutrients of grazed vs. protected, ungrazed sites. The objective was to quantitatively assess factors relating to differential sensitivities of ecosystems to grazing by large herbivores. A key question in this assessment was: Do empirically based, broad—scale relationships correspond to ecological theories of plant—animal interactions and conceptual frameworks for management of the world's grazing lands? Changes in species composition with grazing were primarily a function of ANPP and the evolutionary history of grazing of the site, with level of consumption third in importance. Changes in species composition increased with increasing productivity and with longer, more intense evolutionary histories of grazing. These three variables explained >50% of the variance in the species response of grasslands or grasslands—plus—shrublands to grazing, even though methods of measurement and grazing systems varied among studies. Years of protection from grazing was a significant variable only in the model for shrublands. Similar variables entered models of change in the dominant species with grazing. As with species composition, sensitivities of change in dominant species were greater to varying ecosystem—environmental variables than to varying grazing variables, from low to high values. Increase of the dominant species under grazing were predicted under some conditions, and decreases were more likely among bunch grasses than other life—forms and more likely among perennials than annuals. The response of shrublands was different from that of grasslands, both in terms of species composition and the dominant species. Our analyses support the perception of grazing as a factor in the conversion of grasslands to less desirable shrublands, but also suggest that we may be inadvertently grazing shrublands more intensively than grasslands. Percentage differences in ANPP between grazed and ungrazed sites decreased with increasingly long evolutionary histories of grazing and increased with increasing ANPP, levels of consumption, or years of treatment. Although most effects of grazing on ANPP were negative, some were not, and the statistical models predicted increases in ANPP with grazing under conditions of long evolutionary history, low consumption, few years of treatment, and low ANPP for grasslands—plus—shrublands. The data and the models support the controversial hypothesis that grazing can increase ANPP in some situations. Similar to species variables, percentage differences in ANPP between grazed and ungrazed treatments were more sensitive to varying ecosystem—environmental variables than to varying grazing variables. Within levels not considered to be abusive "overgrazing," the geographical location where grazing occurs may be more important than how many animals are grazed or how intensively an area is grazed. Counter to the commonly held view that grazing negatively impacts root systems, there was no relationship between difference in ANPP with grazing and difference in root mass; as many positive as negative differences occurred, even though most ANPP differences were negative. Further, there was a weak relationship between change in species composition and change in ANPP, and no relationship with root mass, soil organic matter, or soil nitrogen. All three belowground variables displayed both positive and negative values in response to grazing. Current management of much of the world's grazing lands based on species composition criteria may lead to erroneous conclusions concerning the long—term ability of a system to sustain productivity.

Grassland biodiversity response to livestock grazing, productivity, and climate varies across biome components and diversity measurements

Quantitative Effects of Grazing on Vegetation and Soils Over a Global Range of Environments

Grazing and global change factors differentially affect biodiversity‐ecosystem functioning relationships in grassland ecosystems

Grazing-induced Biodiversity Loss Impairs Grassland Ecosystem Stability at Multiple Scales

Biodiversity Explains Maximum Variation in Productivity under Experimental Warming, Nitrogen Addition, and Grazing in Mountain Grasslands.

Effect of grazing and climatic factors on biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships in grassland ecosystems - a case study of typical steppe in Inner Mongolia, China

Biodiversity alleviates the decrease of grassland multifunctionality under grazing disturbance: A global meta-analysis

Experimental impacts of grazing on grassland biodiversity and function are explained by aridity

Long-term grassland diversity-productivity relationship regulated by management regimes in northern China

Responses of forest structure, functions, and biodiversity to livestock disturbances: A global meta-analysis

Grazing alters the soil nematode communities in grasslands: A meta-analysis

Multiple global changes drive grassland productivity and stability: A meta‐analysis

Effects of grazing patterns on grassland biomass and soil environments in China: A meta-analysis

Multi-diversity Strengthens Multifunctionality in Grasslands with Intensive Grazing Pressure

Land use intensity controls the diversity-productivity relationship in northern temperate grasslands of China

[Effects of Grazing on Plant Diversity and Their Carbon Stocks in Different Types of Grasslands]

Assessing the Effects of Climate Variation and Human Activities on Grassland Degradation and Restoration Across the Globe

Heavy grazing reduces the potential for grassland restoration: A global meta-analysis

Relationship between Biomass and Biodiversity of Degraded Grassland in the Sanjiangyuan Region of Qinghai–Tibet Plateau

Advances in Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Grazing on Grassland Ecosystems in China

Grazing intensity significantly affects belowground carbon and nitrogen cycling in grassland ecosystems: a meta-analysis