Abstract:Purpose: To quantify interfractional anatomical variations and their dosimetric impact during the course of fractionated proton therapy (PT) of prostate cancer and to assess the robustness of the current treatment planning techniques.Methods: Simulation and daily in-room CT scans from ten prostate carcinoma patients were analyzed. PT treatment plans (78 Gy in 39 fractions of 2 Gy) were created on the simulation CT, delivering 25 fractions to PTV1 (expanded from prostate and seminal vesicles), followed by 14 boost fractions to PTV2 (expanded from prostate). Plans were subsequently applied to daily CT, with beams aligned to the prostate center in the sagittal plane. For five patients having a sufficiently large daily imaging volume, structure contours were manually drawn, and plans were evaluated for all CT sets. For the other five patients, the plans were evaluated for six selected fractions. The daily CT was matched to the simulation CT through deformable registration. The registration accuracy was validated for each fraction, and the three patients with a large number of accurately registered fractions were used for dose accumulation.Results: In individual fractions, the coverage of the prostate, seminal vesicles, and PTV1 was generally maintained at the corresponding prescription dose. For PTV2, the volume covered by the fractional prescription dose of 2 Gy (i.e., V2) was, on average, reduced by less than 3% compared to the simulation plan. Among the 225 (39 x 5 + 6 x 5) fractions examined, 15 showed a V2 reduction larger than 5%, of which ten were caused by a large variation in rectal gas, and five were due to a prostate shift in the craniocaudal direction. The fractional dose to the anterior rectal wall was found to increase for one patient who had large rectal gas volume in 25 of the 39 fractions, and another who experienced significant prostate volume reduction during the treatment. The fractional bladder dose generally increased with decreasing fullness. In the total accumulated dose for the three patients after excluding a few fractions with inaccurate registration due to a large amount of rectal gas (a condition inconsistent with RTOG protocol), 98.5%, 96.6%, and 98.2% of the PTV2 received the prescription dose of 78 Gy. The V75 and V70 of the anterior rectal wall and bladder both remained within tolerance.Conclusions: The results confirm that the PT planning techniques and dose constraints used at our institution ensure that target coverage to the prescription dose is maintained in the presence of interfractional anatomical variations. Dose coverage in individual fractions can be compromised, and normal tissue dose increased, due to deviations in the bladder and rectal volume compared to the simulation plans or progressive changes in the prostate volume during the treatment. Deviations from the plan can be reduced with efforts aimed at maintaining consistent daily patient anatomy. (C) 2011 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3604152]

Physician scatter dose in interventional CT fluoroscopy

Technical note: A comparison of physician doses in C‐Arm and CT fluoroscopy procedures

A Review of Radiation Protection Requirements and Dose Estimation for Staff and Patients in CT Fluoroscopy

OPTIMISATION OF SCATTER RADIATION TO STAFF DURING CT-FLUOROSCOPY: MONTE CARLO STUDIES

Radiation dose to the radiologist's hand during continuous CT fluoroscopy-guided interventions

Evaluation Of The Dosimetric Impact Of Interfractional Anatomical Variations On Prostate Proton Therapy Using Daily In-Room Ct Images

TU‐C‐110‐01: Patient Dose in CT: Calculating Patient Specific Doses in CT(Joint with Education)

Radiation Dose Levels for Interventional CT Procedures

Study on the dose profile in CT-fluoroscopy

Simulation, Visualization and Dosimetric Validation of Scatter Radiation Distribution under Fluoroscopy Settings

Fluoroscopic Procedure-Room Scatter-Dose Reduction Using a Region-of-Interest (ROI) Attenuator

The profound effects of patient arm positioning on organ doses from CT procedures calculated using Monte Carlo simulations and deformable phantoms.

Radiation exposure of radiologists during different types of CT-guided interventions: an evaluation using dosimeters placed above and under lead protection

SU-F-207-03: Dosimetric Effect of the Position of Arms in Torso CT Scan with Tube Current Modulation

Coronary CT Angiography Radiation Dose Trends: A 10-Year Analysis to Develop Institutional Diagnostic Reference Levels

Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology Procedures

Radiation distribution in a hybrid operating room, utilizing different X-ray imaging systems: investigations to minimize occupational exposure

INVESTIGATION OF PATIENT RADIATION DOSES IN INTERVENTING RADIOLOGY PROCEDURES

Radiation Doses of Cerebral Blood Volume Measurements Using C-Arm CT: A Phantom Study

Technical note: Workload and transmission data for mobile C‐arm fluoroscopy in gastrointestinal endoscopy

Pilot Study on Image Quality and Radiation Dose of CT Colonography with Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Three-Dimensional