Supply and Marketing Cooperatives in Institutional Transition ——Problems, Property Rights and Tendencies
XU Xu-chu,HUANG Zu-hui
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942X.2006.03.015
2006-01-01
Abstract:The supply and marketing cooperatives in China, as an important component part of the planned economy system, are known as a unique economic entity. Before China’s reform and opening-up, they served as an important tool with which the government controlled agriculture, rural areas and farmers. In a sense, this kind of organization once played an essential role in the Chinese agriculture and social and economic life in the countryside. After the reform and opening-up, however, it has been faced with rigorous challenges and then gradually lost its traditional superiority due to the dramatic development of the country's market economy. Recent years have witnessed the strategic turning point of its institutional transition, and its trend of evolution will have a bearing on the rationality of its existence as a distinct institutional arrangement. Undoubtedly, the supply and marketing cooperative as an organization is currently being faced with many problems, such as its complex property rights, vague positioning, shrinking functions, loosed basis and weak performance of the organization. In the above-mentioned problems of the cooperative, the most fundamental one is the absence of the ultimate owners, which will certainly lead to the inappropriate governance structure that normally appears to be the insiders' domination over the residual claim. On the whole, the cooperative has three options at the moment: being oriented to ″agriculture, rural areas and farmers″, to an ″administrative institution″, or to an ″enterprise″, among which the first orientation is the most realistic and feasible, compared with the other two. But it is no easy job at all to choose the first orientation, as it is required that the cooperative should undergo a further and deeper reform aiming at coping with the fundamental problems that the cooperative faces. In other words, the key link of the reform is how to identify the proper ultimate owners and to establish a scientific governance structure.