Association between the controlling nutritional status score and outcomes in ischemic stroke patients with active cancer

Rei Sakurai,Yasufumi Gon,Yuki Shimada,Shuhei Okazaki,Kenichi Todo,Tsutomu Sasaki,Hideki Mochizuki

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2024.01.011

IF: 2.116

2024-01-22

Journal of Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract:Background The effect of nutritional status on survival in ischemic stroke patients with active cancer remains unclear. Methods This study retrospectively evaluated ischemic stroke patients with active cancer admitted to a university hospital in Japan between 2006 and 2016. Patients were followed for 2 years after stroke. The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score was used to classify undernutrition degree into 4 groups: normal, light, moderate, and severe. Survival rates were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for mortality were calculated using Cox regression models. Results A total of 158 patients (31 % women; median age: 71 years) were analyzed. Of these, 47 % had distant metastasis. The median (interquartile range) National Institute of Health Stroke Scale and CONUT scores were 4 (1–10) and 5 (3–7), respectively. Kaplan-Meier curve indicated that patients with poorer nutritional status had worse outcomes (overall log-rank test, p < 0.001). The univariable Cox regression analysis showed that the HR (95 % CI) for the light, moderate, and severe groups were 1.14 (0.45–2.86), 3.01 (1.27–7.12), and 2.94 (1.10–7.84), respectively. This statistical significance did not persist after adjustment for potential confounders (HR [95 % CI] for the light, moderate, and severe groups were 0.95 [0.36–2.49], 1.56 [0.57–4.28], and 1.34 [0.37–4.92], respectively). Past stroke, distant metastasis, and plasma D-dimer levels on admission were independent predictors of prognosis. Conclusions This single-center, retrospective study suggests that nutritional status serves as a prognostic indicator for ischemic stroke patients with active cancer. However, the effect is not statistically independent.

neurosciences,clinical neurology