Abstract:Large-diameter monopiles are the predominant foundation solution for supporting offshore wind turbines. They are conventionally designed using soil reaction curves developed for long slender piles used for supporting offshore oil and gas platforms (e.g., the API p-y model). However, due to the difference in the length/diameter ratio and the resulting soil mechanisms, the use of p-y curves alone can lead to significant under-prediction of the lateral stiffness and capacity of monopiles. To overcome the shortcoming, the authors have previously proposed a conceptual two-spring framework, i.e., the so-called 'p-y + M-R-theta(R)' model, to capture the monopile response in soft clay under lateral loading. The framework uses distributed p-y springs to consider the lateral soil resistance along the pile above the rotation point (RP) and a single moment-rotation (M-R-theta(R)) spring attached at the RP to capture the entire soil resistance below the RP, i.e., the distributed resistance along the pile, base shear and base moment at the pile tip. The proposed p-y and M-R-theta(R) springs were curve-fitted to the results of 3D numerical analyses. However, as the stress-strain response and the shear strength profile inevitably influence the p-y and M-R-theta(R) springs, the applicability of the empirical formulations to soil conditions other than those examined is uncertain. This study proposes an enhancement to the 'p-y + M-R-theta(R)' framework, in which the p-y and M-R-theta(R) springs are not tied to a specific soil and strength profile but fundamentally linked to the properties that can be measured directly in the site investigation and laboratory. This extension is achieved through analytical analyses and an extensive parametric numerical study. The predictive capabilities of the model are demonstrated by back-analyses of finite element analyses and centrifuge model tests. The proposed model provides practising engineers with a simple yet powerful approach to use site-specific soil reaction curves in the design of monopiles embedded in soft clay.

A theoretical calculation method based on nonlinear analysis of offshore rigid monopile on sandy slopes under combined loading

Numerical Analysis of Monopile Behavior under Short-Term Cyclic Loading

A method for calculating lateral response of offshore rigid monopile in sand under slope effect

Lateral Cyclic Pile–soil Interaction Studies on a Rigid Model Monopile

DETERMINATION ON CRITICAL DEPTH OF MONOPILE IN SAND UNDER CYCLIC HORIZONTAL LOAD

Effect of Loading Rate on Lateral Pile-Soil Interaction in Sand Considering Partially Drained Condition

Research on the laterally loaded piles under huge moment based on Lagrange multipliers method

Analysis Approach of Piled Jacket Foundation in Sand for Offshore Wind Turbines Subjected to Lateral Loads

Centrifuge Modelling of Lateral Loading Behaviour of a “Semi-Rigid” Mono-pile in Soft Clay

Lateral Behavior of Monopiles in Sand under Monotonic Loading: Insights and a New Simple Design Model

Model tests on characteristics of ocean and offshore elevated piles with large lateral deflection

Field and Numerical Study of the Lateral Response of Rigid Piles in Sand

Influence of Pile Diameter and Aspect Ratio on the Lateral Response of Monopiles in Sand with Different Relative Densities

A Unified Lateral Soil Reaction Model for Monopiles in Soft Clay Considering Various Length-to-diameter (L/D) Ratios

Numerical Simulation of Offshore Monopiles with Reinforcement in Shallow Soil Layer

A Simple Rotational Spring Model for Laterally Loaded Rigid Piles in Sand

Influence of Vertical Shear Stresses Due to Pile-Soil Interaction on Lateral Dynamic Responses for Offshore Monopiles

A Simplified Model for Predicting the Accumulated Displacement of Monopile under Horizontal Cyclic Loadings

Site-specific soil reaction model for monopiles in soft clay based on laboratory element stress-strain curves

Lateral static stiffness of offshore monopile socketed in soft rock

Dynamic model test on monopile for offshore wind turbine under jointed lateral environmental load and seismic load