A landmark-based approach to locate symptom-specific transcranial magnetic stimulation targets of depression

Rongrong Du,Qian Zhou,Tianzheng Hu,Jinmei Sun,Qiang Hua,Yingru Wang,Yuanyuan Zhang,Kongliang He,Yanghua Tian,Gong-Jun Ji,Kai Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.919944

IF: 3.8

2022-09-02

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:Objective Two subregions of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex have been identified as effective repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targets for the “anxiosomatic” and “dysphoric” symptoms, respectively. We aimed to develop a convenient approach to locate these targets on the scalp. Materials and methods In a discovery experiment, the two personalized targets were precisely identified on 24 subjects using a neuronavigation system. Then, a localized approach was developed based on individual scalp landmarks. This “landmark-based approach” was replicated and validated in an independent cohort ( N = 25). Reliability of the approach was tested by calculating the correlation of both the inter-rater and intra-rater results. Validity was tested by comparing the mean distance between the personalized and landmark-based targets to the TMS spatial resolution (i.e., 5 mm). We further conducted a total of 24 sham rTMS sessions to estimate the misplacement between the coil center and target during a 10-min stimulation without neuronavigation. Results The parameters of the “landmark-based approach” in the discovery experiment were replicated well in an independent cohort. Using discovery parameters, we successfully identified the symptom-specific targets in the independent cohort. Specifically, the mean distance between the personalized and landmark-based targets on the cortex was not significantly larger than 5 mm. However, the personalized and landmark-based targets distance exceeded 5 mm in more than 50% of subjects. During the 10-min sham rTMS session, the average coil misplacement was significantly larger than 5 mm. Conclusion The “landmark-based approach” can conveniently and reliably locate the two symptom-specific targets at group level. However, the accuracy was highly varied at individual level and further improvement is needed.

psychology, multidisciplinary