Abstract:Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Follow-up in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) is essential to avoid adverse events and complications, such as arrhythmias, device dysfunction, and infections, among other events. Prevention plays a fundamental role, especially when these patients undergo non-cardiological invasive tests and/or procedures (e.g., surgeries) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These situations sometimes require the reprogramming of the device. In our Arrhythmia's Unit, after developing a healthcare management model based on the Lean methodology, 2 processes were identified that implied a reduction in activity, a threat to efficiency and a risk to patients who would undergo invasive non-cardiological procedures or MRI. One of them was a significant number of "urgent" consultations and calls to evaluate and/or reprogram CIED in patients that underwent invasive non-cardiological procedures the same day, many of them without indication of reprogramming according to the type of procedure. Another one was the increase in consultations of people with CIED who require MRI, was often contraindicated because it produces adverse effects on the patient and/or device. Objectives: To implement action protocols, depending on the type of device and dependant on stimulation, for patients with CIED who undergo surgery and invasive non-cardiac procedures and MRI. To evaluate the number of urgent calls and adverse events before and after implementation. Methods: A single-centre, not randomized study has been designed. A year before and after the implementation of the protocol the following variables were quantified a) number of urgent calls b) number of adverse events (persistence of the special programming of the device more than 24 h after the end of the procedure: asynchronous stimulation, ICD therapies off, CIED dysfunction or unnecessary programming). Two protocols were developed: a) management of CIED carriers undergoing invasive non-cardiological procedures according to recent clinical practice guidelines. b) risk of dysfunction after MRI based on type/compatibility with MRI of the device, implanted leads, and stimulation dependence, using a colour scale, from safe (in green) to high risk of dysfunction (in black) Pictures 1,2. The protocols for action in the anaesthesia and radiology services were disseminated through sessions given by the arrhythmia unit staff. Results: In the year prior to implementing the protocol, 185 urgent calls/year were quantified, (15.1 calls/month) and the number of adverse events was 4 (0.2 events/month). One year after the implementation of the protocol, urgent calls were reduced to 4calls/year, representing 0.33 calls/month (p <0.001) and there was an absence of adverse events (zero events/month). Conclusions. The implementation of protocols based on recent clinical practice guidelines can reduce urgent calls and adverse events related to reprogramming in our centre, thus increasing patient safety.

A novel non-contact remote interrogate system based on 5G telecommunication technique during cardiac implantable electrical devices implantation against the background of the global COVID-19 pandemic

The clinical use of remote parameter testing during cardiac implantable electronic devices implantation procedures: a single center, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial

[Feasibility and safety of remote programming in postoperative follow-up of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices]

[Experiences of Applying Home Monitoring for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices].

Analysis of Clinical Application of Magnetic Compatible Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device in a Chinese Population

Evaluation for the Usability of Carelink Remote Monitoring System by Clinical Physicians

Implementation of a Novel Bluetooth Technology for Remote Deep Brain Stimulation Programming: the Pre– and Post–COVID‐19 Beijing Experience

Implantation of cardiac electronic devices in active COVID-19 patients: Results from an international survey

Construction of Pre-hospital and In-hospital Emergency Medical Service System Based on 5G Communication Technology

Switching to a 100% remote follow‐up of implantable cardiac electronic devices: Organizational model and results of a single center experience

An IoT Assisted Real-Time High CMRR Wireless Ambulatory ECG Monitoring System with Arrhythmia Detection

A 5G-powered robot-assisted teleultrasound diagnostic system in an intensive care unit

Cloud Follow-Up in Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices: A Single-Region Study in China

Abstract 16857: Design and Implementation of a Prehospital Electrocardiogram Remote Transmission and Data Recording App for Acute Myocardial Infarction Based on WeChat in China

Abstract 15437: Use of Artificial Intelligence to Decrease Data Deluge From Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

Early Smartphone App-Based Remote Diagnosis of Silent Atrial Fibrillation and Ventricular Fibrillation in a Patient with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator

Cardiac telerehabilitation under 5G internet of things monitoring: a randomized pilot study

Beyond nursing programming: preventing adverse events in patients with implantable cardiac devices undergoing invasive procedures and MRI after lean healthcare method

Long-distance Tele-robotic-assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Case Report of First-in-patient in China

The Amigo™ Remote Catheter System: From Concept to Bedside

Interference of GSM mobile phones with communication between Cardiac Rhythm Management devices and programmers: A combined in vivo and in vitro study.