Abstract:1. Selection and evaluation of loss functions: An extensive evaluation of different loss functions, including asymmetric unified focal loss, dice similarity coefficient loss, and cross entropy, is conducted to address challenges in segmenting lung infections caused by COVID‐19 in computed tomography images. 2. Comparative performance analysis: This study compared these loss functions using different deep learning architectures, highlighting their impact on segmentation accuracy. 3. Illustrative examples of segmentation performance: Examples demonstrating the effectiveness of these loss functions in identifying and delineating lung lesions are presented. This study evaluates the effectiveness of three loss functions Asymmetric Unified Focal Loss (AUFL), Dice Similarity Coefficient Loss (DSCL), and Cross‐Entropy (CE) for segmenting COVID‐19 lung infections in computed tomography images. Detailed analyses using the intersection over union metric assessed each function's accuracy. AUFL achieved an average Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 85.18% ± 8.86%, outperforming DSCL 85.18% ± 8.86%, which had the same average DSC but less precise segmentation, and CE, which had an average DSC of 78.31% ± 11.93%. Segmentations using AUFL demonstrated more defined contours and better alignment with actual anatomical structures than those obtained with DSCL and CE. Observations revealed that AUFL‐generated segmentations had more precise boundaries and were more consistent with the expected anatomical regions of lung infections. This study is the first to quantitatively and qualitatively compare the effectiveness of AUFL, DSCL, and CE in segmenting COVID‐19 lung infections, providing concrete evidence of AUFL's superiority in segmentation performance and reliability for clinical applications. The findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate loss functions to enhance segmentation in medical imaging, highlighting their crucial role in improving image‐based diagnostics and treatment. The study emphasizes the need for ongoing research to optimize these segmentation techniques further.

Loss odyssey in medical image segmentation

Segmentation Loss Odyssey

Adaptive Region-Specific Loss for Improved Medical Image Segmentation

Boundary-wise Loss for Medical Image Segmentation Based on Fuzzy Rough Sets

A Generalized Surface Loss for Reducing the Hausdorff Distance in Medical Imaging Segmentation

Unified Focal loss: Generalising Dice and cross entropy-based losses to handle class imbalanced medical image segmentation

Offset Curves Loss for Imbalanced Problem in Medical Segmentation

Contour-weighted loss for class-imbalanced image segmentation

Testing Segmentation Popular Loss and Variations in Three Multiclass Medical Imaging Problems

Rethinking Dice Loss for Medical Image Segmentation.

Dual-Term Loss Function for Shape-Aware Medical Image Segmentation.

Optimization for Medical Image Segmentation: Theory and Practice when evaluating with Dice Score or Jaccard Index

High-Resolution Boundary Detection for Medical Image Segmentation with Piece-Wise Two-Sample T-Test Augmented Loss

Boundary Difference Over Union Loss For Medical Image Segmentation

Optimizing the Dice Score and Jaccard Index for Medical Image Segmentation: Theory & Practice

Enhancing Foreground Boundaries for Medical Image Segmentation

Residual Moment Loss for Medical Image Segmentation

Boundary-Sensitive Loss Function With Location Constraint for Hard Region Segmentation

blob loss: instance imbalance aware loss functions for semantic segmentation

High-level Prior-based Loss Functions for Medical Image Segmentation: A Survey

Advancing precision in medical image segmentation: A performance analysis of loss functions for COVID‐19 lung infection segmentation in computed tomography images