Small airway dysfunction in patients after mild COVID-19

Beuter,H.,Nichici,T.,Stanko,K.,Russ,A.-K.,Reinke,L.,Nürnberger,C.,Störk,S.,Zoller,T.,Steinbeis,F.,Heim,E.,Hopff,S. M.,Vehreschild,J. J.,Heuschmann,P. U.,Lieb,W.,Franzpötter,K.,Poick,S.,Krawczak,M.,Abdo,M.,Rabe,K. F.,Heyckendorf,J.,Schreiber,S.,Kirsten,A.-M.,Bahmer,T.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2024.pa5259
IF: 24.3
2024-11-01
European Respiratory Journal
Abstract:Background : Small airway dysfunction (SAD) might be a feature of Post-COVID syndrome (PCS). SAD can be assessed by impulse oscillometry (IOS) in a tidal breathing maneuver, or by body plethysmography (BP) and forced spirometry (FS), both of which depend on investigator skill and patient adherence. Objective : We aimed to investigate the extent of SAD in PCS patients, who were severity graded by self-reported symptoms using a PCS score (PCSS, Bahmer et al., eClinicalMedicine, 2022). Methods : The multicenter, prospective COVIDOM study investigates sequelae of PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections in individuals ≥6 months after acute COVID-19. IOS, BP and FS were performed according to ERS guidelines investigating frequency dependence of resistance (FDR abs / R 5-20Hz ), RV/TLC, and FEV 1 /FVC. According to the PCSS, participants were grouped into none/mild (I), moderate (II) and severe PCS (III). Results : We included 2,811 valid lung function results in our analysis. 8.8% showed airflow limitation (FEV 1 /FVC ULN) (GLI 2012 reference values) and 40.5 % increased FDR abs (>0.03kPa/l/s). Comparing PCS-I to PCS-II and PCS-III, the z-score for FEV 1 /FVC (–0.36±1.08; –0.37±0.95; –0.30±1.01, p>0.05) did not differ between groups while the z-score for RV/TLC (0.77±1.25; 0.82±1.1; 0.90±1.18, p=0.03) and FDR abs displayed significant differences (0.032±0.08; 0.033±0.06; 0.043±0.06, p=0.001). Conclusion : Self-reported PCS severity was associated with SAD as assessed by IOS and BP. IOS needs little expertise in lung function testing and could therefore easily be integrated in PCS assessment. Despite broad availability, FEV 1 might be insensitive to the subtle changes of airway physiology in affected individuals.
respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?