Oral Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin After inferior Vena cava Filter Implantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Ilya Schastlivtsev,Aleksey Pankov,Sergey Tsaplin,Evgeny Stepanov,Sergey Zhuravlev,Kirill Lobastov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10760296241256938
2024-05-25
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Abstract:Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, Volume 30, Issue , January-December 2024. ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared to warfarin after inferior vena cava (IVC) filter implantation.MethodThis retrospective analysis includes data from 100 patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) who underwent IVC filter implantation due to a free-floating thrombus (n = 64), thrombus propagation (n = 8), or acute bleeding (n = 8) on therapeutic anticoagulation, catheter-directed thrombolysis (n = 8), or had previously implanted filter with DVT recurrence. Patients were treated with warfarin (n = 41) or rivaroxaban (n = 59) for 3-12 months. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence and bleeding events were assessed at 12 months follow-up.ResultsThree (7.3%) cases of VTE recurrence without IVC filter occlusion occurred on warfarin and none on rivaroxaban. The only (2.4%) major bleeding occurred on warfarin. Three (5.1%) clinically relevant non-major bleedings were detected on rivaroxaban. No significant differences existed between groups when full and propensity scores matched datasets were compared.ConclusionsRivaroxaban seems not less effective and safe than warfarin after IVC filter implantation.
peripheral vascular disease,hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?