Real‐world analysis of adverse event rates after initiation of ibrutinib among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Scott F. Huntington,Enrico de Nigris,Justin T. Puckett,Sachin Kamal‐Bahl,Mohammed Farooqui,Katherine Ryland,Eric M. Sarpong,Siyang Leng,Xiaoqin Yang,Jalpa A. Doshi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6953
IF: 4.711
2024-02-03
Cancer Medicine
Abstract:In a real‐world analysis of over 11,000 Medicare beneficiaries with CLL who initiated ibrutinib, the overall incidence rate of adverse events was 62.5 per 1000 patient‐months for all discontinuers and 32.9 per 1000 patient‐months for non‐discontinuers. Discontinuers had a higher incidence rate of AEs per 1000 patient‐months compared with non‐discontinuers for all AEs examined, largely driven by patients who discontinued within 12 months of ibrutinib initiation. These findings highlight a clear unmet need for improved management of ibrutinib‐related AEs and/or new treatments to improve real‐world outcomes in patients with CLL. Background The first‐generation BTK inhibitor ibrutinib is a standard‐of‐care therapy in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) despite potential side effects that often lead to discontinuation. Methods This study used 2013–2019 claims data to describe the incidence rate of adverse events (AEs) among elderly Medicare beneficiaries newly initiating ibrutinib for CLL. Results The final sample contained 11,870 Medicare beneficiaries with CLL (mean age 77.2) newly initiating ibrutinib, of whom 65.2% discontinued over mean follow‐up of 2.3 years. The overall incidence rate of AEs was 62.5 per 1000 patient‐months for all discontinuers and 32.9 per 1000 patient‐months for non‐discontinuers. Discontinuers had a higher incidence rate of AEs per 1000 patient‐months compared with non‐discontinuers for all AEs examined, including infection (22.8 vs. 14.5), atrial fibrillation (15.1 vs. 7.0), anemia (21.9 vs. 14.5), and arthralgia/myalgia (19.5 vs. 13.6). Conclusion In this first real‐world study of a national sample of elderly US patients treated with ibrutinib, we found a clear unmet need for improved management of ibrutinib‐related AEs and/or new treatments to improve real‐world outcomes in patients with CLL.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?