Abstract:Consumers face many risky situations that can severely impact their wealth or health from one year to the next. People sometimes behave in inconsistent ways in such settings; many individuals faced with these risks do not consider purchasing insurance until after suffering a loss, but then they may cancel their policy a few years later if they have not had a claim (Kunreuther, Pauly, and McMorrow 2013). Our interest is in why a consumer, having decided whether or not to purchase insurance for a particular year, might change that decision over time – even if the person’s risk and insurance premium remain exactly the same every year in the future. In some circumstances (fire insurance, life insurance), many people renew their policies year after year in ways consistent with relevant tradeoffs that consider the likelihood and consequences of a particular risk in relation to the cost of the insurance. If these individuals make decisions systematically, they should not change their insurance decision over time if the probability, the premiums, and the consequences from the risk remain the same from year to year. However, we find that a significant number of people are swayed by their emotions and past experiences when making their future insurance decisions. This behavior is particularly common for risks that are classified as low-probability, high-consequence (LP-HC) events. Because consumers’ knowledge is incomplete, ambiguous, and biased by recent experience, they may rely on their intuition to decide whether to buy, keep, drop, or change the extent of their insurance coverage. Potential buyers may not face an identical set of circumstances year after year. Loss probabilities may change over time (for example, due to global warming, build-up of earthquake stresses, or onset of a chronic health condition). Buyers may be confused about whether experiencing a major loss tells them something about future probabilities, even if they are explicitly informed as to the potential damage from a future low probability event. Having suffered a personal loss may affect how the person feels about next year’s coverage. The interplay between changing expectations about next period’s risk and willingness to buy insurance can, in theory and in practice, affect buyer behavior in many different ways.

Effects of behavioral biases on life insurance demand decisions in Uganda

Analyzing factors affecting risk aversion: Case of life insurance data in Korea

Risk attitudes and demand for insurance: micro evidence from Ghana

Gender perspective on life insurance demand in Ghana

THE DETERMINANTS OF DEMAND FOR MICRO INSURANCE SERVICES IN KENYA

Demand for non-life insurance: A Sub-Saharan region panel data analysis

Cognitive bias, intuitive attributes and investment decision quality in commercial real estate in Uganda

Consumers’ Decision on Perspective of Rationality Economics and Willingness to Demand Health Insurance

Measuring and Mitigating Biases in Motor Insurance Pricing

Behavioral Economics of Multiperiod Insurance Purchasing Behavior: The Role of Emotions

Determinant of life insurance demand in Ethiopia

Utility Function's Influence on Insurance Policy Customer Choices

An " Academic Review and Critique of Gender Dynamics and Life Insurance Uptake in Ghana: A Study of the 2018 Publication by Ampaw et al."

Determinants of Life Insurance Demand: Empirical Evidence from BRICS Countries

Decision Making in Personal Insurance: Impact of Insurance Literacy

How basis risk and spatiotemporal adverse selection influence demand for index insurance: Evidence from northern Kenya

Quantitative model for impact of behavioral biases on asset allocation decisions: a case study of investors in UAE

Comparing the effects of behaviorally informed interventions on flood insurance demand: an experimental analysis of ‘boosts’ and ‘nudges’

The role of behavioral bias on financial decision making: a systematic literature review and future research agenda

Predictive Modeling of Insurance Claims in Rwanda