Abstract:Aim/Background: BSA dosing leads to great inter-individual DTX PK variability, which is a major contributor for severe toxicity, especially in East-Asian populations. DTX exposure measured by area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) could positively predict DTX related neutropenia. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to assess the value of PK-guided DTX dosing on relieving toxicity.Methods: To date, 99 Asian advanced NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to receive single agent 3-weekly DTX chemotherapy for up to 6 cycles, either at a fixed standard dose of 75 mg/m2 by BSA (arm1) or at a PK-guided dose (arm2) with a same starting dose. AUC is calculated from a published PK model. Dose of subsequent cycles of arm2 patients is calculated base on previous cycle, according to optimal AUC target (2.5–3.7 µg•h/mL) algorithm. Dose reductions were permitted in both arms for toxicities. The study had a power of 80% to detect a 23% reduction of grade >3 neutropenia with PK-guided arm.Results: Patients' major characteristics were male (62.6%), non-smoker (58.6%), ECOG 0 (80.8%) and adenocarcinoma (74.7%). 1st cycle of dosing 75 mg/m2 for all patients show 11 folds of PK variability, with mean AUC of 4.53 (range 1.8-20.3, CV = 56%), only 29.2% were in the target. Major patients (59.4%) were over exposed to DTX, experienced 18.5% higher of grade ≥3 neutropenia incidence. PK-guided dosing strategy could significantly reduce the dose of DTX, with a reduction of 8.6 mg/m2 (64.4 vs. 73.0, p < 0.001) in 2nd to 6th cycles. Patients therefore experienced 25.4% lower of grade ≥3 neutropenia incidence in PK-guided dose arm (47.5% vs. 72.9%, p = 0.002). Overall response rate showed no differences between arm2 and arm1 (20.0% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.769), so is progression free survival (4.6 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.567).Conclusions: Majority of East-Asian NSCLC patients were over-exposed to DTX at a dose of 75 mg/m2. PK-guided dosing strategy could reduce DTX related neutropenia without efficacy damage.Clinical trial identification: NCT01891123Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Aim/Background: BSA dosing leads to great inter-individual DTX PK variability, which is a major contributor for severe toxicity, especially in East-Asian populations. DTX exposure measured by area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) could positively predict DTX related neutropenia. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to assess the value of PK-guided DTX dosing on relieving toxicity. Methods: To date, 99 Asian advanced NSCLC patients were randomly assigned to receive single agent 3-weekly DTX chemotherapy for up to 6 cycles, either at a fixed standard dose of 75 mg/m2 by BSA (arm1) or at a PK-guided dose (arm2) with a same starting dose. AUC is calculated from a published PK model. Dose of subsequent cycles of arm2 patients is calculated base on previous cycle, according to optimal AUC target (2.5–3.7 µg•h/mL) algorithm. Dose reductions were permitted in both arms for toxicities. The study had a power of 80% to detect a 23% reduction of grade >3 neutropenia with PK-guided arm. Results: Patients' major characteristics were male (62.6%), non-smoker (58.6%), ECOG 0 (80.8%) and adenocarcinoma (74.7%). 1st cycle of dosing 75 mg/m2 for all patients show 11 folds of PK variability, with mean AUC of 4.53 (range 1.8-20.3, CV = 56%), only 29.2% were in the target. Major patients (59.4%) were over exposed to DTX, experienced 18.5% higher of grade ≥3 neutropenia incidence. PK-guided dosing strategy could significantly reduce the dose of DTX, with a reduction of 8.6 mg/m2 (64.4 vs. 73.0, p < 0.001) in 2nd to 6th cycles. Patients therefore experienced 25.4% lower of grade ≥3 neutropenia incidence in PK-guided dose arm (47.5% vs. 72.9%, p = 0.002). Overall response rate showed no differences between arm2 and arm1 (20.0% vs. 17.5%, p = 0.769), so is progression free survival (4.6 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.567). Conclusions: Majority of East-Asian NSCLC patients were over-exposed to DTX at a dose of 75 mg/m2. PK-guided dosing strategy could reduce DTX related neutropenia without efficacy damage. Clinical trial identification: NCT01891123 Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis of G-CSF during chemotherapy for prostate cancer, Japanese clinical guideline for appropriate use of G-CSF: clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF during chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor during dose-dense chemotherapy for urothelial cancer: Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis to develop clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022

Effectiveness of G-CSF in chemotherapy for digestive system tumors: a systematic review of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022 delineated by the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology

Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF for patients with non-round cell soft tissue sarcomas: a systematic review for the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022 of the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF for patients with Ewing sarcomas: a systematic review for the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Use of G-CSF 2022 of the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF after induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022 from the Japan society of clinical oncology

Optimal timing of prophylactic pegylated G-CSF after chemotherapy administration for patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis from Clinical Practice Guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022

Effectiveness and safety of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor priming regimen for acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Clinical Practice Guideline for the use of G-CSF 2022 from the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology

Prevention of docetaxel‐associated febrile neutropenia with primary granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor in Chinese metastatic hormone‐sensitive and castration‐resistant prostate cancer patients

Evaluation of the Quality of Life and Economic Burden with Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor in Chinese Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Docetaxel, Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide

A Multicenter, Prospective, Non-Interventional Real-World Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Mecapegfilgrastim in Preventing Neutropenia in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer.

Efficacy and Safety for the Use of Half-Dosed Pegylated Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factors in Preventing Febrile Neutropenia During Chemotherapy in Patients With Malignant Tumors: A Multicenter, Open-Labeled, Single-Arm Phase 2 Trial

Real-world study of mecapegfilgrastim in preventing neutropenia in patients with gastrointestinal tumors

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor has the potential to attenuate the therapeutic efficacy of chemo-immunotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer

424PD Individualization of docetaxel (DTX) treatment in East-Asian advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients based on pharmacokinetically (PK)-guided dosing strategy: an open-label randomized clinical trial

Efficacy and tolerability of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in cancer patients after chemotherapy: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Impact of PEG-GCSF in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Single Center Experience and Literature Review

Efficacy and Safety of Mecapegfilgrastim in Preventing Neutropenia During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

Safety and Efficacy of PEG-rhG-CSF As Primary Prophylaxis Against Neutropenia Induced by Combination Chemotherapy Regimens Involving Oral Chemotherapy Agents in Gastrointestinal Cancer Patients: A Prospective, Exploratory, Non-Randomized Controlled Study.