Abstract:Understanding the global patterns of human and wildlife spatial associations is essential for pragmatic conservation implementation, yet analytical foundations and indicator‐based assessments that would further this understanding are lacking. We integrated the global distributions of 30,664 terrestrial vertebrates and human pressures to map human–nature index (HNI) categories that indicate the extent and intensity of human–wildlife interactions. Along the 2 dimensions of biodiversity and human activity, the HNI allowed placement of terrestrial areas worldwide in one of 4 HNI categories: anthropic (human‐dominated areas), wildlife‐dominated (little human influence and rich in wildlife), co‐occurring (substantial presence of humans and wildlife), and harsh‐environment (limited presence of humans and wildlife) areas. The HNI varied considerably among taxonomic groups, and the leading driver of HNI was global climate patterns. Co‐occurring regions were the most prevalent (35.9%), and wildlife‐dominated and anthropic regions encompassed 26.45% and 6.50% of land area, respectively. Our results highlight the necessity for customizing conservation strategies to regions based on human–wildlife spatial associations and the distribution of existing protected area networks. Human activity and biodiversity should be integrated for complementary strategies to support conservation toward ambitious and pragmatic 30×30 goals. Patrones globales de las asociaciones espaciales entre humanos y fauna y las implicaciones para la diferenciación de las estrategias de conservación Resumen Es esencial entender los patrones globales de asociaciones entre humanos y fauna para la implementación pragmática de la conservación. Aun así, son muy pocos los fundamentos analíticos y las evaluaciones basadas en indicadores que incrementarían este conocimiento. Integramos la distribución global de 30,664 vertebrados terrestres y presiones humanas para mapear las categorías del índice de naturaleza humana (INH) que indican la extensión e intensidad de las interacciones humano‐fauna. El INH permitió la colocación de áreas terrestres en todo el mundo en las dos dimensiones de la biodiversidad y las actividades humanas dentro de una de las cuatro categorías del INH: áreas antrópicas (dominadas por humanos), dominadas por fauna (poca influencia humana y rica en fauna), co‐ocurrentes (presencia sustancial de humanos y fauna) y de ambiente severo (presencia limitada de humanos y fauna). El INH varió considerablemente entre los taxones, y el factor principal fueron los patrones climáticos mundiales. Las regiones co‐ocurrentes fueron las más frecuentes (35.9%) las regiones antrópicas y dominadas por fauna englobaron el 26.45% y 6.50% del área terrestre respectivamente. Nuestros resultados enfatizan la necesidad de personalizar las estrategias de conservación acorde a la región con base en las asociaciones espaciales entre humanos y fauna y la distribución de las redes existentes de áreas protegidas. La actividad humana y la biodiversidad deberían estar integradas para las estrategias complementarias para respaldar a la conservación hacia los objetivos ambiciosos y pragmáticos de 30 para el 30. 人与野生动物空间关联的全球格局及其对差异化保护策略的启示理解人与野生动物多样性空间关系的全球模式对于实施务实的保护至关重要。然而, 目前支撑这一理解的分析基础和基于指标的评估仍然不足。本文通过整合全球30,664种陆生脊椎动物与人类压力的分布, 提出了一套空间明确的人与自然指数(human‐nature index, HNI)。我们发现, 不同动物类群间的HNI差异很大, 而全球气候格局是影响HNI的主要因素。沿着生物多样性和人类压力两个维度, HNI指数将全球陆地范围划分为四个HNI区域:人类主导区(anthropic), 野生动物主导区(wildlife‐dominated), 共存区(co‐occurring), 与荒芜区(harsh environment)。共存区是占陆地面积最大的区域(35.9%), 野生动物主导区和人类主导区分别占陆地面积的26.45%和6.50%。我们的研究结果强调了根据人与野生动物的空间关联, 以及现有保护地网络分布格局, 制定适合各区域保护策略的必要性。应该将人类活动与生物多样性整合分析, 以支持实现既具雄心, 又公平、务实的"30×30"目标。

Bird species' tolerance to human pressures and associations with population change

Bird tolerance to humans in open tropical ecosystems

Urban tolerance does not protect against population decline in North American birds

Flight initiation distance and bird tolerance to humans in rural and urban habitats

Frequency‐dependent tolerance to aircraft disturbance drastically alters predicted impact on shorebirds

Ancient occupation by humans leads to missing bird diversity in otherwise natural habitats

Flush Distance:Bird Tolerance to Human Intrusion in Hangzhou

Global patterns of human–wildlife spatial associations and implications for differentiating conservation strategies

Urban birds’ tolerance towards humans was largely unaffected by increased variation in human levels due to COVID-19 shutdowns

Shedding light on trophic interactions: A field experiment on the effect of human population between latitudes on herbivory and predation patterns

The ecological traits of birds in the context of future changes of their ranges under the impact of global climate change

Avian responses to extreme weather across functional traits and temporal scales

Testing the links between bird diversity, alien species and disturbance within a human‐modified landscape

Population trends are more strongly linked to environmental change and species traits in birds than mammals

Population responses of bird populations to climate change on two continents vary with species’ ecological traits but not with direction of change in climate suitability

Spatio‐temporal integrated Bayesian species distribution models reveal lack of broad relationships between traits and range shifts

Sensitivity of tropical montane birds to anthropogenic disturbance and management strategies for their conservation in agricultural landscapes

Urban birds' tolerance towards humans was largely unaffected by COVID-19 shutdown-induced variation in human presence

Local human population increase in the non‐breeding areas of long‐distance migrant bird species is only weakly associated with their declines, even for synanthropic species

Interactive effects of fearfulness and geographical location on bird population trends

A life-history spectrum of population responses to simultaneous change in climate and land use