Abstract:Attentional capture is of great importance in revealing the relationship between two kinds of attentional control:bottom-up process and top-down process.The study explored the effect of working memory load on attentional capture,in order to probe into the effect of top-down cognitive control on attentional capture.Two experiments' programs were run on a Dell computer using DMDX.In Experiment 1,we compared capture by a color singleton during visual search between a single-task condition and a dualtask condition in which the search task was combined with a working memory task.The search task was very similar to that in Theeuwes(1992).The subjects were asked to search for diamonds among circles and make a speeded response to the orientation (horizontal or vertical) of a line within it.The subjects in the search task received two conditions:(1) a no color distractor condition, all stimulus being green;(2) a color distractor condition,one of those circles being red singleton distractor.The another task was memory load including two conditions:(1) no memory load;(2) memory load,subjects being asked to rehearse a set of five digits during the search task in order to determine whether a memory probe following the search task was present or absent.In Experiment 2,these tasks were similar to Experiment 2.In this part,memory load included two conditions:(1) high memory load(six digits); (2) low memory load(two digits).The program recorded the response time and accuracy when the subjects performed the memory load and search tasks.All of the dependent variables were analyzed with repeated measure ANOVA.The results showed that(1)The subjects suffered from greater interference by a color distractor during search when they had to rehearse a set of digits.(2) The effect of attentional capture by color singleton increased with the increase of memory load levels.Our conclusions are:Firstly,the cognitive control function of working memory not only affected selective attention but also attentional capture.Secondly,attentional capture was not purely a stimulus driven but was subject to the top-down control.Thus,the higher working memory load,the more the effects of attentional capture produced by the irrelevant singleton.

The dynamics of attentional guidance by working memory contents

The Automatic Guidance of Attentional Selection From Visual Working Memory

The Effect of Working Memory Load on Attentional Capture

The Temporal Dynamics of Visual Working Memory Guidance of Selective Attention.

Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection.

Attentional Guidance from Multiple Working Memory Representations: Evidence from Eye Movements

The Object As the Unit of Interaction Between Visual Working Memory and Visual Attention

Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory

Attention without working memory: A feature-specific working memory gate for attended information

Working-Memory-Guided Attention Competes with Exogenous Attention but Not with Endogenous Attention.

Both Bottom-Up and Top-Down Control Influence Multiple Working Memory-Driven Attentional Selection

Event Working Memory Selectively Impairs Dynamic Tracking

Attentional Guidance from Two Representations of the Same or Different Dimensions in Visual Working Memory

The Competitive Influences of Perceptual Load and Working Memory Guidance on Selective Attention.

Involuntary and Voluntary Processes Compete for Entering the Focus of Attention of Working Memory.

Guidance of Visual Attention from Working Memory Contents Depends on Stimulus Attributes.

Working Memory Biases Early Object Discrimination and Parietal Activity During Attentional Selection

The Influence of Working Memory Load of Binding on Selective Attention

Multisensory working memory capture of attention

Interference Between Smooth Pursuit and Color Working Memory.

The allocation of working memory resources determines the efficiency of attentional templates in single- and dual-target search.