Abstract:Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measures are becoming increasingly used in clinical trials as primary outcome measures. Investigators are now asking statisticians for advice on how to analyse studies that have used HRQoL outcomes.HRQoL outcomes, like the SF-36, are usually measured on an ordinal scale. However, most investigators assume that there exists an underlying continuous latent variable that measures HRQoL, and that the actual measured outcomes (the ordered categories), reflect contiguous intervals along this continuum. The ordinal scaling of HRQoL measures means they tend to generate data that have discrete, bounded and skewed distributions. Thus, standard methods of analysis such as the t-test and linear regression that assume Normality and constant variance may not be appropriate. For this reason, conventional statistical advice would suggest that non-parametric methods be used to analyse HRQoL data. The bootstrap is one such computer intensive non-parametric method for analysing data. We used the bootstrap for hypothesis testing and the estimation of standard errors and confidence intervals for parameters, in four datasets (which illustrate the different aspects of study design). We then compared and contrasted the bootstrap with standard methods of analysing HRQoL outcomes. The standard methods included t-tests, linear regression, summary measures and General Linear Models.Overall, in the datasets we studied, using the SF-36 outcome, bootstrap methods produce results similar to conventional statistical methods. This is likely because the t-test and linear regression are robust to the violations of assumptions that HRQoL data are likely to cause (i.e. non-Normality). While particular to our datasets, these findings are likely to generalise to other HRQoL outcomes, which have discrete, bounded and skewed distributions. Future research with other HRQoL outcome measures, interventions and populations, is required to confirm this conclusion.

Nonparametric bootstrap methods for hypothesis testing in the event of double-censored data

Bootstrap Inference for Panel Data Quantile Regression

Smoothed bootstrap for right-censored data

Wild bootstrap inference for penalized quantile regression for longitudinal data

Analysis of small sample size studies using nonparametric bootstrap test with pooled resampling method

An accurate percentile method for parametric inference based on asymptotically biased estimators

Multiple Comparisons of Treatment Against Control under Unequal Variances Using Parametric Bootstrap

Confidence intervals centered on bootstrap smoothed estimators

Unbiased Test Error Estimation in the Poisson Means Problem via Coupled Bootstrap Techniques

A Discontinuity Adjustment for Subdistribution Function Confidence Bands Applied to Right-Censored Competing Risks Data (with Erratum)

Bootstrap Inference for Hawkes and General Point Processes

A simple bootstrap method for constructing nonparametric confidence bands for functions

Bootstrap algorithms for small samples

The use of bootstrap methods for analysing Health-Related Quality of Life outcomes (particularly the SF-36)

Nonparametric incidence estimation and bootstrap bandwidth selection in mixture cure models

Simple resampling methods for censored regression quantiles

A bootstrap semiparametric homogeneity test for the distributions of multigroup proportional data, with applications to analysis of quality of life outcomes in clinical trials

Bootstrap Inference in Cointegrating Regressions: Traditional and Self-Normalized Test Statistics

Nonparametric bootstrap inference for the targeted highly adaptive least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) estimator

On confidence intervals centered on bootstrap smoothed estimators

A bootstrap procedure to estimate the causal effect of a public policy, considering overlap and imperfect compliance