Abstract:How does the genome encode the form of the organism? What is the nature of this genomic code? Common metaphors, such as a blueprint or program, fail to capture the complex, indirect, and evolutionarily dynamic relationship between the genome and organismal form, or the constructive, interactive processes that produce it. Such metaphors are also not readily formalised, either to treat empirical data or to simulate genomic encoding of form in silico. Here, we propose a new analogy, inspired by recent work in machine learning and neuroscience: that the genome encodes a generative model of the organism. In this scheme, by analogy with variational autoencoders, the genome does not encode either organismal form or developmental processes directly, but comprises a compressed space of latent variables. These latent variables are the DNA sequences that specify the biochemical properties of encoded proteins and the relative affinities between trans-acting regulatory factors and their target sequence elements. Collectively, these comprise a connectionist network, with weights that get encoded by the learning algorithm of evolution and decoded through the processes of development. The latent variables collectively shape an energy landscape that constrains the self-organising processes of development so as to reliably produce a new individual of a certain type, providing a direct analogy to Waddingtons famous epigenetic landscape. The generative model analogy accounts for the complex, distributed genetic architecture of most traits and the emergent robustness and evolvability of developmental processes. It also provides a new way to explain the independent selectability of specific traits, drawing on the idea of multiplexed disentangled representations observed in artificial and neural systems and lends itself to formalisation.

System-Level Genetic Codes Using a Transposable Element-Like Mechanism with Applications to Cancer

System-Level Genetic Codes: An Explanation for Biological Complexity

Genetic Code Expansion in Enteric Bacterial Pathogens

Familiar biological, chemical and physical events credibly evolve the Standard Genetic Code

Genetic Code Expansion History and Modern Innovations

Fail-safe genetic codes designed to intrinsically contain engineered organisms

Robust genetic codes enhance protein evolvability

A model for the emergence of the genetic code as a transition in a noisy information channel

Efforts and Challenges in Engineering the Genetic Code

Cracking the Code: Reprogramming the Genetic Script in Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes to Harness the Power of Noncanonical Amino Acids

Preventing escape and malfunction of recoded cells due to tRNA base changes

Three phases in the evolution of the standard genetic code: how translation could get started

The Genomic Code: The genome instantiates a generative model of the organism

Non-coding DNA programs express adaptation and its universal law

Near-ideal selection for the Standard Genetic Code

Modulation of Base Specific Mutation and Recombination Rates Enables Functional Adaptation within the Context of the Genetic Code

The Hypercube Structure of the Genetic Code Explains Conservative and Non-Conservative Aminoacid Substitutions in vivo and in vitro

A Network Of Cancer Genes With Co-Occurring And Anti-Co-Occurring Mutations

Recent advances in the expanding genetic code

Towards targeting transposable elements for cancer therapy

Evolutionary mechanism unifies the hallmarks of cancer