Personalized infant risk prediction for severe respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infection requiring intensive care unit admission

Brittney M Snyder,Niek B Achten,Tebeb Gebretsadik,Pingsheng Wu,Edward F Mitchel,Gabriel Escobar,Louis J Bont,Tina V Hartert
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae077
2024-02-06
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Abstract:Abstract Background Currently, there are no available tools to identify infants at the highest risk of significant morbidity and mortality from respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) who would benefit most from RSV prevention products. The objective was to develop and internally validate a personalized risk prediction tool for use among all newborns that uses readily available birth/postnatal data to predict RSV LRTI requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Methods We conducted a population-based birth cohort study of infants born 1995-2007, insured by the Tennessee Medicaid Program, and who did not receive RSV immunoprophylaxis during the first year of life. The primary outcome was severe RSV LRTI requiring ICU admission during the first year of life. We built a multivariable logistic regression model including demographic and clinical variables available at or shortly after birth to predict the primary outcome. Results In a population-based sample of 429,365 infants, 713 (0.2%) had severe RSV LRTI requiring ICU admission. The median age of admission was 66 days (interquartile range 37-120). Our tool, including 19 variables, demonstrated good predictive accuracy (AUC 0.78, 95% CI 0.77, 0.80) and identified infants who did not qualify for palivizumab, based on American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines, but had higher predicted risk levels than infants who qualified (27% of non-eligible infants with >0.16% predicted probabilities [lower quartile for eligible infants]). Conclusions We developed a personalized tool that identified infants at increased risk for severe RSV LRTI requiring ICU admission, expected to benefit most from immunoprophylaxis.
immunology,infectious diseases,microbiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?