Evaluation of dental students' learning curve in intraligamentary anesthesia using different syringe systems: A prospective crossover study

Philipp Luhrenberg,Mirjam Renders,Diana Heimes,Anke Hollinderbäumer,Sebahat Kaya,Solomiya Kyyak,Saskia V. Schröger,Daniel G. E. Thiem,Helen Wagner,Peer W. Kämmerer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13754
2024-10-30
Journal of Dental Education
Abstract:Purpose/objectives This prospective crossover preclinical trial aimed to evaluate the learning curve of dental students in successfully administering intraligamentary anesthesia (ILA) using three different syringe systems. Methods Dental students performed ILA using three devices in two separate sessions, each targeting mandibular and/or maxillary premolars. The devices included two manual systems (pistol‐type and lever‐based) and one computer‐controlled local anesthetic delivery system (CCLAD). The primary research parameter was the success rate of anesthesia, defined as the percentage of successful ILA administrations confirmed by a negative response to a cold test. Secondary parameters included pain experienced during needle penetration and injection, students' self‐reported levels of mental tension and handling of the syringes, and any potential side effects. Results A total of 110 students performed ILA on 599 teeth during the study period. When comparing the CCLAD system to the manual syringes, the CCLAD system exhibited a significantly higher overall success rate in the first session (92.5% vs. 77.4%; p
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?