Abstract:Slope stability is the most important stage in the stabilization process for different scale slopes, and it is dictated by the factor of safety (FS). The FS is a relationship between the geotechnical characteristics and the slope behavior under various loading conditions. Thus, the application of an accurate procedure to estimate the FS can lead to a fast and precise decision during the stabilization process. In this regard, using computational models that can be operated accurately is strongly needed. The performance of five different machine learning models to predict the slope safety factors was investigated in this study, which included multilayer perceptron (MLP), support vector machines (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), decision tree (DT), and random forest (RF). The main objective of this article is to evaluate and optimize the various machine learning-based predictive models regarding FS calculations, which play a key role in conducting appropriate stabilization methods and stabilizing the slopes. As input to the predictive models, geo-engineering index parameters, such as slope height (H), total slope angle (β), dry density (γd), cohesion (c), and internal friction angle (φ), which were estimated for 70 slopes in the South Pars region (southwest of Iran), were considered to predict the FS properly. To prepare the training and testing data sets from the main database, the primary set was randomly divided and applied to all predictive models. The predicted FS results were obtained for testing (30% of the primary data set) and training (70% of the primary data set) for all MLP, SVM, k-NN, DT, and RF models. The models were verified by using a confusion matrix and errors table to conclude the accuracy evaluation indexes (i.e., accuracy, precision, recall, and f1-score), mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE). According to the results of this study, the MLP model had the highest evaluation with a precision of 0.938 and an accuracy of 0.90. In addition, the estimated error rate for the MLP model was MAE = 0.103367, MSE = 0.102566, and RMSE = 0.098470.

Slope Stability Predictions using Machine Learning Techniques

Application of Machine Learning Techniques in Slope Failure Analysis

Stability prediction of a natural and man-made slope using various machine learning algorithms

Evaluation and Prediction of Slope Stability Using Machine Learning Approaches

Slope Safety, Stability Evaluation, and Protective Measures Based on Machine Learning

Slope Stability Prediction Method Based on Intelligent Optimization and Machine Learning Algorithms

Slope Stability Analysis Using Rf, Gbm, Cart, Bt and Xgboost

Performance Evaluation and Engineering Verification of Machine Learning Based Prediction Models for Slope Stability

Closure to "applying Knowledge-Guided Machine Learning to Slope Stability Prediction"

Application of Machine Learning Techniques for the Estimation of the Safety Factor in Slope Stability Analysis

Application of Machine Learning in Slope Stability Assessment

Slope stability machine learning predictions on spatially variable random fields with and without factor of safety calculations

Machine-Learning-Based Classification Approaches toward Recognizing Slope Stability Failure

Slope Stability Prediction Using K-Nn-based Optimum-Path Forest Approach

Determining the Geotechnical Slope Failure Factors via Ensemble and Individual Machine Learning Techniques: A Case Study in Mandi, India

Prediction of safety factors for slope stability: comparison of machine learning techniques

Slope stability prediction based on a long short-term memory neural network: comparisons with convolutional neural networks, support vector machines and random forest models

Slope stability analysis using artificial intelligence techniques

Exploring Machine Learning Techniques for Open Stope Stability Prediction: A Comparative Study and Feature Importance Analysis

Learning Failure Modes of Soil Slopes Using Monitoring Data

Slope Stability Prediction Using Integrated Metaheuristic and Machine Learning Approaches: A Comparative Study