Extubation Advisor: Implementation and Evaluation of A Novel Extubation Clinical Decision Support Tool
Brett N. Hryciw,Natasha Hudek,Jamie C. Brehaut,Christophe Herry,Nathan Scales,Emma Lee,Aimee J. Sarti,Karen E.A. Burns,Andrew J.E. Seely
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241291524
2024-10-26
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Abstract:Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, Ahead of Print. ImportanceExtubation Advisor (EA) is a novel software tool that generates a synoptic report for each Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) conducted to inform extubation decision-making.ObjectivesTo assess bedside EA implementation, perceptions of utility, and identify barriers and facilitators of use.Design, Setting and ParticipantsWe conducted a phase I mixed-methods interventional study in three mixed intensive care unit (ICUs) in two academic hospitals. We interviewed critical care physicians (MDs) and respiratory therapists (RTs) regarding user-centered design principles and usability.AnalysisWe evaluated our ability to consent participants (feasibility threshold 50%), capture complete data (threshold 90%), generate and review EA reports in real-time (thresholds 75% and 80%, respectively), and MD perception of tool usefulness (6-point Likert scale). We analyzed interview transcripts using inductive coding to identify facilitators and barriers to EA implementation and perceived benefit of tool use.ResultsWe enrolled 31 patients who underwent 70 SBTs. Although consent rates [31/31 (100%], complete data capture [68/68 (100%)], and EA report generation [68/70 (97.1%)] exceeded feasibility thresholds, reports were reviewed by MDs for [55/70 (78.6%)] SBTs. Mean MD usefulness score was 4.0/6. Based on feedback obtained from 36 interviews (15 MDs, 21 RTs), we revised the EA report twice and identified facilitators (ability to track patient progress, enhance extubation decision-making, and provide support in resource-limited settings) and barriers (resource constraints, need for education) to tool implementation. Half of respondents (9 MDs, 9 RTs; combined 50%) perceived definite or potential benefit to EA tool use.ConclusionThis is the first study of a waveform-based variability-derived, predictive clinical decision support tool evaluated in adult ICUs. Our findings support the feasibility of integrating the EA tool into bedside workflow. Clinical trials are needed to assess the utility of the EA tool in practice and its impact on extubation decision-making and outcomes.Trial RegistrationNCT04708509
critical care medicine