Sibling and pet relationships: links with adversity and adjustment in pre-adolescence

Mishika Mehrotra,Naomi White,Sarah Foley,Claire Hughes,Mishika MehrotraNaomi WhiteSarah FoleyClaire Hughesa University of Cambridgeb University of Edinburgh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2024.2317727

IF: 5.5

2024-03-02

Applied Developmental Science

Abstract:Although children view pets (i.e. companion animals) as family members, child-pet relationships are rarely studied alongside other family relationships. In a socially diverse sample of 77 British families with pre-adolescent children ( M age = 12.14 years, SD = 0.29 years), we examine how the quality of children's relationships with their pets and siblings vary in the context of adversity, and controlling for parent-child relationship quality, predict their behavioral adjustment. Children reported on the quality of their relationships and mothers rated child adjustment. Mother, child, and researcher ratings were combined to construct a multi-informant index of adversity. Child-pet positivity differed by adversity level for girls (but not boys) and, in low adversity contexts, was associated with greater concurrent prosocial behavior. Sibling positivity was unrelated to adversity, but had a buffering effect, in that adversity only predicted increases in problem behaviors over 12 months for those with low sibling positivity.

psychology, developmental

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### Research Purpose

This study aims to explore how the quality of relationships between children and their siblings and pets is affected by adversity, and to examine how these relationships influence children's behavioral adaptability.

### Main Objectives

1. **Impact of Adversity on Relationship Quality**: Compare how adversity affects the quality of relationships between children and their siblings and pets. The study hypothesizes that under high levels of adversity, children will report more positive relationships with pets but more negative relationships with siblings.

2. **Association Between Relationship Quality and Behavioral Adaptability**: Investigate whether the positivity of relationships between children and their siblings and pets can predict children's behavioral problems and prosocial behavior (both immediately and one year later), while controlling for gender, social adversity, and parent-child relationship quality. It is expected that more positive relationships will be associated with fewer behavioral problems and more prosocial behavior.

3. **Interaction Between Adversity and Relationships**: Examine whether positive relationships between children and their siblings and pets can buffer the negative impact of adversity on children's adaptive behavior. It is anticipated that in the face of adversity, children with more positive relationships will exhibit fewer behavioral problems and more prosocial behavior.

### Method Overview

- **Participants**: The study subjects are 77 children around the age of 12, from families with different socioeconomic backgrounds.
- **Procedure**: Data was collected through two home visits, including children's self-reported relationship quality and mothers' reports of children's behavioral adjustment.
- **Measurement Tools**:
- **Relationship Positivity**: Assessed using the Network of Relationships Inventory to evaluate the relationships between children and their siblings and pets.
- **Mother-Child Relationship Quality**: Assessed using the Kerns Security Scale.
- **Children's Behavioral Adjustment**: Assessed using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire to evaluate children's prosocial behavior and behavioral problems.
- **Adversity Index**: Constructed based on multiple information sources, including seven indicators covering various aspects of socioeconomic disadvantage.

### Summary of Results

- **Differences in Relationship Positivity**: Girls have more positive relationships with pets compared to boys.
- **Adversity and Relationship Positivity**: Among girls, in low adversity environments, positive relationships with pets are associated with higher prosocial behavior.
- **Sibling Relationships**: Unrelated to adversity, but in low adversity environments, positive sibling relationships have a buffering effect, meaning that adversity only predicts increased problem behavior 12 months later when sibling relationships are poor.

In summary, this study seeks to understand the quality of relationships between children and family members (siblings and pets) in the context of adversity and their impact on children's behavioral adaptability.